IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] KSK-Sentinal: Once more down the naming rathole.

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Wed, 21 February 2018 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67B012DA3F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:43:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnLXNVvg2xNk for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0196212DA25 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id r80so4016137lfe.13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:43:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ni6r+BXX5I7JjUE1JLoRxL5LCURVWDPbDB0Mw1rjzvA=; b=ZPYqtmnWe0Y04vI2FFcvNaNXX6L1a6FsFKVesnDm4VesKEkY/zOCk+G3jSVMsrSCLt 7B4Ae6D9GUw+C03pHDYR8VJPGsRyZ7WSNQM5rzazPWZPF4hVbl4DC6Mrxj0hy2QV52C5 i57t3ekbnu/rU3puNtOlyZUM0Xz6fSqyQJPUkBrQgAF5vYcUWI25p/AlwxQKE75gfWnQ jYbeNI3GebYchIXTo2hNDS3/osxPC92EoSCEmO+L7xFfVy3c/EeiPBGavHnlaTmIZZeK AYkSIiNqaj9NlQ34lnMic3gKSDvGjrF+FRVI/t7dBLAXlbKNDxg04wNT40PhSGerqDcQ u6bg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ni6r+BXX5I7JjUE1JLoRxL5LCURVWDPbDB0Mw1rjzvA=; b=PkOZD6qeEN0PR3luDDVd/c/UVbpyBZ1joXVEDM0HaKKlv2GIka+ZrXjavcUMdq79iv sgEQm1LU/zmSB9mDzEu0C4LdaWlAOLZcFYAqIAycY8Wbd3OAzf3IBCQ5rg5acKlJuwJN 3XWweLuA0YcBYF+ADURxW4kuXSQMY++yfDmluEViFLHgPAReuAbiIIiXr+lEEtLlG0p0 TxIkR8jYxCHb3sr9NkkKr25oPDt1lfBLoQcK8a4rEAPztpOhMFBZkX59vPeP52wNsI1v xOR0wqfYbY2OrnUc9woDStfpIJwDCTTf+L9GZhNf/w2b6aYYx8WHhRhnG+3Hg9w7sI2Y YzqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBP8rg3u7WfbxXaKDu0pou+dCNvt0Eth2F47yPqA7JRFzt0nUfI lLszoZj3RJTZBUgZnlHbEIFEnC1CtB1akFkf9waCuQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226MAU4+aRPwihBn7OEG8xCFE5oMZSfGhlqY6kO0/sxDy1Ri28HQ01Ws+b7KwFRhl1xpFogyTh1yrSXWbZxrtaQ=
X-Received: by 10.25.163.85 with SMTP id m82mr3197401lfe.54.1519242183075; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:43:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.91.221 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:43:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DC8845C9-6329-4A02-97F9-45C991726F71@vpnc.org>
References: <CAHw9_iLqEerV-So7704qu7A2mbD6YQbzdF8A3FEGtUPOE+6NWw@mail.gmail.com> <DC8845C9-6329-4A02-97F9-45C991726F71@vpnc.org>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:43:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8D6zbVMJmntTtEub0iLSB=3Qf8khMu6VibOGrDM55oXpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11402f52a678cf0565be2220"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7D0eDrcPecp9EGQo9ATFkJKoSQY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] KSK-Sentinal: Once more down the naming rathole.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:43:07 -0000

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> On 21 Feb 2018, at 11:15, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> What does the WG prefer? Is the new KSK called "20326" or it is "4f66"?
>>
>> Hex has the advantage that A: Knot already does this! B: it is shorter
>> as a label.
>>
>> What would y'all like?
>>
>
> Some preference for 20326 because it is easier to read and there is no
> possibility of mis-match due to capitalization. Would live with hex if you
> said "lowercase hex" for the presentation form.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
>
Prefer numeric, since RFC4034 specifies that for display, and everywhere I
see key tags in a google search they are always that way.  "dig" shows them
that way.

-- 
Bob Harold

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email