IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 06 December 2013 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D9F1AC82A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 01:42:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a9nAB1cyoBOK for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 01:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D4D1AE311 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 01:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id F1A5E2801C2; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:42:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFCF280036; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:42:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8C8B38039; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:41:40 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:41:40 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Message-ID: <20131206094140.GB8309@nic.fr>
References: <6DBBC8339C394DBDAE4FE1F764E02A8D@hopcount.ca> <20131203170825.GA17211@nic.fr> <21D03162-81D1-494A-89A9-41BE89D28A0E@nominum.com> <BB7627E9-8D50-48E5-B809-64AE4D574271@virtualized.org> <20131203221006.GB5689@sources.org> <D3E446D0-F9ED-4671-A1C2-29A15D3DE010@virtualized.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1312041229560.8824@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <6A3B7F5A-238C-45BC-AFF9-38F3213A7322@virtualized.org> <20131205084044.GB5215@nic.fr> <98F4DF09-2C6C-4FE2-A020-D6CDD2741739@virtualized.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <98F4DF09-2C6C-4FE2-A020-D6CDD2741739@virtualized.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.2
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 09:42:35 -0000

On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:36:53AM -0800,
 David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote 
 a message of 60 lines which said:

> With the proliferation of new TLDs, how is anyone supposed to know
> if a TLD is a real TLD and not some pseudo-domain that looks like a
> TLD but isn't really 

I disagree with the use of depreciative words like "pseudo-TLD". A TLD
is a TLD in any case, specially if it is registered (in the USG root,
in the special domain registry of RFC 6761, etc). 

For .onion or its friends (.bit has been added to the new version of
the Internet-Draft), "non-DNS TLD" seems reasonable.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email