IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 29 September 2016 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39B612B308 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AeMg72fRhfVF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com (mail-lf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6727412B172 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l131so82939397lfl.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WF2DcnEdpTg+IUzfo7znRf1kfAN+oktZ5F68KggzqjA=; b=Hq7+b5ZTlUbtIhi1IZfBasoQhl14+w41MW1Oqovqorufn2W9nN930rCl55UFjQjkxS mf8jjuPqetKbcJGGYCj+gmHwYBu2KE+HIeZQe9ytcPkG6MX8dp24b6dQYpLNdF8SvgKY ufX6O7XUWVrauT0WQUYbBWe8cZo6MHXQf1+Ejrt8ej15i91q3mybO1kOqlDOeunOiqJZ sCJ0eZ0LvPgkH0BemCs5CYi/4fJBzzm/OHnJbloUXqc5b4m5y/6m9MX4qLHh2uBw3BlH v9phzmkFoEMNUelGPxdci18rwOYCRbq8DDVBaDKupYX5w7kFaw1IA48DdsudXkDArDb3 0ySQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WF2DcnEdpTg+IUzfo7znRf1kfAN+oktZ5F68KggzqjA=; b=VPPAoa8lBLXcSUOWBhf06iplA3zTwrXv03GMZoSY8jRlREBPOMTV7+3u11gDcaUSSH 3Ivz6DzqRcFlK9aaTF74FYP+P5nAwO2s2OOn/JYHkLCXvROyfqXPP3v5GwtCuaquhrkm +ILZBu/xXxe5SF0zSp9clMXX5iNEf4B/iJOcOGv7lZWA7+07ypisCzOqeRaWos7HZEa4 hIom49lE2wJ08bg/9v0YksqtyNNXYc5KxUviVkEbRR3+4FJ+6TN1xXBW7JVgTP6/t8V0 KPYN8FTYwHevNBBtpK5NpJ0h84EaMw98HVOoznH5WO5mBfP4xU8zmUwhO3yUmyFOlSac nvWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnMwQ/+WD4K++/83KlpdbtOe/b21BSz9w6wnZT/cjYQjHn3pzK+CBrFNkwE5HWi2QXWiku7ey7il3XNow==
X-Received: by 10.25.87.20 with SMTP id l20mr712446lfb.181.1475160656537; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B493661B-B3D7-4912-9C99-38363BC9C7BB@nohats.ca>
References: <CAHw9_i+UVH78URWzk+4x=j9BZiKfX3C+UeFU9vz1OfZ3tPeN1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160920133357.hbvtkrg5uwgzu4wh@nic.fr> <CAHw9_iJ-9mMsu30fyEtJd7y7BPDh3BFjiXOK8dE_UynuF65sPg@mail.gmail.com> <20160925110204.GA12227@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1609251232400.22547@bofh.nohats.ca> <20160928212406.GC4192@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <BFAA2528-7310-4D10-99ED-48F8F8DA0B43@nohats.ca> <CAPt1N1nhUCuMzynKbzQO23Mcu92xuFeA5SAY6KHDiOcw=rW=7g@mail.gmail.com> <B493661B-B3D7-4912-9C99-38363BC9C7BB@nohats.ca>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:50:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1m5tYkY5K-BK2j_kEhwABUyQMXcDT3+9CEWDwBP3vyPuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140eadeeb82c2053da69a2f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7K1zK8GuICgk9Lm7JzkP8UyP1Eo>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:51:04 -0000

Carrot and stick. The current IESG can certainly abstain new proposals to
death, and individual ADs can refuse to publish. But in doing so they are
trying to lead the consensus on a new direction. They cannot unilaterally
change it.

On Sep 29, 2016 10:27, "Paul Wouters" <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:21, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> >
> > To be clear, while the IESG may have said something about their
> > willingness to entertain further uses of the 6761 process, the 6761
> > process represents current IETF consensus.   If we don't update it, it
> > stands.
>
> That does contract earlier statements  from dnsop that stated no new 6761
> based special names would be considered until we had a new solution.
>
> Paul
>

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status