[DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-11

Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 08 August 2018 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403F6130DF9; Wed, 8 Aug 2018 05:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153373205122.6368.16143820330220001109@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 05:40:51 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7YkFuWpbTDxYN3Jho_Y7gu-e-R0>
Subject: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-11
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 12:40:51 -0000

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-08-08
IETF LC End Date: 2018-08-13
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The document is ready for publication as a BCP with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

1.  In section 2 the term DNAME is mentioned and while CNAME is specified DNAME
is not (maybe reference RFC6672?)

2. In section 5 "Most resorece record " typo.

3. This is more a comment and since I did not follow the progress of the
document I am not sure the motivation here. Reading the text I noticed that in
the definition of referrals in section 4 the text include also what looks to me
like logic starting from the third paragraph. I was wondering why is it here
and not in one of the standard track documents and referenced here. I saw that
this is a big change from RFC7719.