Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rrserial-00.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sun, 13 June 2021 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane@sources.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95A53A1FC2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 09:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NbVcuB1Kz9HU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 09:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [92.243.4.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BFCA3A1FC6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 09:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 5027FA0278; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 18:18:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6FBA5190B87; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 18:15:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 18:15:40 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210613161540.GA14433@sources.org>
References: <162342216090.6059.5920585323129043595@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <162342216090.6059.5920585323129043595@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.9
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7YqExxlms9KU5evdlVAJME7gv2M>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rrserial-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 16:18:14 -0000

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 07:36:00AM -0700,
 internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote 
 a message of 39 lines which said:

>         Title           : The "RRSERIAL" EDNS option for the SOA serial of a RR's zone
>         Authors         : Hugo Salgado
>                           Mauricio Vergara Ereche
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-rrserial-00.txt

I do not understand why the RRSERIAL EDNS is not added for NXDOMAIN
responses (section 3.2). Specially since it is added for SERVFAIL,
which is surprising.