Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR?
joao damas <joao@bondis.org> Wed, 07 October 2009 15:05 UTC
Return-Path: <joao@bondis.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D423A6ABA for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6V4BwjAtqBS9 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.bondis.org (voyager.c-l-i.net [194.176.119.229]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54BD3A6AB9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-25-203.ripemtg.ripe.net (dhcp-25-203.ripemtg.ripe.net [193.0.25.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.bondis.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D499A1AB2FF; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 15:07:03 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <A0F1C816-3FB4-4C83-A1BB-265349EB39DD@bondis.org>
From: joao damas <joao@bondis.org>
To: Joe Baptista <baptista@publicroot.org>
In-Reply-To: <874c02a20910070644kdea3964t77ba2ec4e10a7747@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:06:58 +0100
References: <B668D106-141E-48EB-8C2D-C4AC7C2EB4DD@dnss.ec> <5B26E4A7-68AB-449D-B402-E7E6EAA6AB80@bondis.org> <874c02a20910070644kdea3964t77ba2ec4e10a7747@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:05:27 -0000
wasn't talking about DLV On 7 Oct 2009, at 14:44, Joe Baptista wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:32 AM, joao damas <joao@bondis.org> wrote: > > Since a date was announced yesterday (July 1st) for a fully deployed > signed root, can we expect ITAR to Go Away on Januari 1st 2011 ? > > I would hope it stays around. Having an "out of band" way of > contrasting the info in the root zone is a valuable service to have. > > Don't expect that to happen. Once the root is signed it is prudent > to remove DLV so as to ensure complete root slavery. > > regards > joe baptista
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? joao damas
- [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Roy Arends
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? joao damas
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Joe Baptista
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Chris Thompson
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? joao damas
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Roy Arends
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? John Schnizlein
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR? Mark Andrews