Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 10 March 2017 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C976712955F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:08:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aHySSmvZiwwo for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:08:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617CE12955E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:08:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v125so162556176qkh.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:08:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mdVMlbKY8556VAcPmiynPpSZhHGw31Vqearut7eM+e8=; b=1MAqveEzI2iSzOET2UoArTg2nPtLf0RsATdXftmTpIc24Dp+lYOMB7GMWHCmgta7IP bqsNQg0P8K+902+YDveBGEKjW1NKpuQmXmXKJoPjg+oYYx6PXk8qwm8dnRchSQdHprPo DT8uF01dSaY5qhPw1zbCXVIto672uG7l2+BvBdZHTH5E5kImFZNshsfkgcKDIBjlT0dx 0y71QrhMAfc6UOmYfk/2g8qCCBxEuSxQNArFJW0hvuNolcF63HSJNI1e1f8Sj90H4uW0 qpeiax/k87P/YW72FUuvg/nb07ysoWCryU0rleQjwRUcXbWEOOIcPDgYV4kCPT+gc8ju q6Kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mdVMlbKY8556VAcPmiynPpSZhHGw31Vqearut7eM+e8=; b=pkFHjyZFEAXgz9riq8Yz8WulbCxNs26ADJVWVbQyTRxLS2eF6m/7xiQWp5D36QvM9v 7NqsA/aEYMQoCr5mNq/G3NLw/d8qhZYsBtSm7RU7L2a3kFgh3fVtJPFnVYxZckASoBhD 8r/4zIpwc+TBvxl6oFci3pcv9rK4dA9Sc/GY7hD84NzTtecBF0S7uszX8DE1PC5QDfJ1 L5YuLDEcb5h8n2tLY5kivuH92od7CG4iuiksH6E4s0cH93GWtfTfBZuLZyNNJ6SqH9AD jYXsrl1OvF5fQ+EPDWHTYwpLjBMRCOH4HNwBJQSt5NqTomgRGLRDLJb5eOh6FpH06Utf U7hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2WFd11CmLxRntX1RWuy7t7t63vEDC0dLQlmwpaWaYGXbVMsv4eywB7ChGKGkYWfimm49U8iBiY32ysNC+7
X-Received: by 10.55.142.69 with SMTP id q66mr18556532qkd.13.1489151308294; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:08:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.177.11 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:07:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1AD82FB6-735A-4124-A0A3-2158EC567AD6@nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+GUDg2iA+MQ9xjNLDVvRgnd9PD=pLBNNvp0xK3UZVSqTA@mail.gmail.com> <1AD82FB6-735A-4124-A0A3-2158EC567AD6@nohats.ca>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:07:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iK+SWiHZwGgHZRO2T1MLVQZS-2BaeZBzyUuZ0iWHX2ZjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7h6u6oqRPatGfa7pX5HOMI3Ijkg>
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:08:30 -0000

Once a document becomes a WG document the authors are required to
incorporate WG consensus.

If this does not / is not happening, the chairs have the option /
responsibility to replace the authors with ones that do...

W

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 9, 2017, at 18:54, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We’re going to go ahead and adopt it for DNSOP, with the intention of
>> resolving the concerns people expressed by keeping the status as
>> informational (not standards track) and making sure the cautions and
>> limitations the WG discussed on the use of RPZ are clear in the document.
>
> I don't understand how this works.
>
> The authors clearly stated the document will describe only what is currently implemented and they were
> not willing to make changes. How can this ever turn into a real WG document?
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf