[DNSOP] Re: Mahesh Jethanandani's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-09: (with COMMENT)

[Wes Hardaker <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the comments Mahesh,

Responses inline:

Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker <[e-mail]> writes:

> Section 7.2, paragraph 10
> >    *  Update the registration policy for the [DS-IANA] registry to match
> >       the text describing update requirements above.
> >
> >    *  Mark values 128 - 252 as "Reserved"
> >
> >    *  Mark values 253 and 254 as "Reserved for Private Use"
> >
> >    *  Delete the (now superfluous) column "Status" from the registry
> >
> >    Additionally, the registration policy for the [DS-IANA] registry
> >    should match the text describing the requirements in this document.
> 
> I think the two statements on "registration policy for the [DS-IANA] registry
> are confusing. Can we get rid of one of them?

Dropped the second.

> "Abstract", paragraph 2
> >  the status (MUST, MAY, RECOMMENDED, etc) of any of the algorithms listed in
> >                                      ^^^
> In American English, abbreviations like "etc." require a period.

fixed

> "Abstract", paragraph 2
> > tus (MUST, MAY, RECOMMENDED, etc) of any of the algorithms listed in RFC8624;
> >                                   ^^^^^^^^^
> Consider simply using "of" instead.

fixed

> Section 1.1, paragraph 4
> > less of implementation status. In general it is expected that deployment of
> >                                   ^^^^^^^
> A comma is probably missing here.

fixed

> 
> Section 1.2, paragraph 2
> > thms to become used less and less over time. Once an algorithm has reached a
> >                                   ^^^^^^^^^
> Did you mean "overtime" (=time someone works beyond normal working
> hours)?

It should be with a space (https://writingexplained.org/over-time-vs-overtime-difference)

> Section 1.2, paragraph 3
> > C2119] considers the term SHOULD equivalent to RECOMMENDED, and SHOULD NOT eq
> >                                  ^^^^^^^^^^
> The word "equivalent" is a noun or an adjective. A verb is missing or
> misspelled, or maybe a comma is missing.

"to be" was missing, thanks.
-- 
Wes Hardaker                                     
USC/ISI