IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ECDSA woes

Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com> Sun, 16 October 2016 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <olafur@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64954129447 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9wJNO5r5QkD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5303812943B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id j37so166698189ioo.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6gNprwcIrfNUByBUSqsB/epQazjonyDsfjQqsTt8CWg=; b=zKJB39So0iYBqBpU4u7rmdCXZPrNFV4D92Lz5L6nc8nKoyYiBYliJXoFKr+Y/X0raZ VTFVAIuykF81HrsIRAdJ8Mx6h2aw+mte9fta+9t1TPum4FuWCJ07C24wi6hVja3193f2 GiOKVtKQKlMrlokVtgAFV18141WzYObhIgJ3c=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6gNprwcIrfNUByBUSqsB/epQazjonyDsfjQqsTt8CWg=; b=hSTIZdyDZuSUAAh9135cds+t4ThLk4gcLWhSB3X6ToGDIE004tuSMiSlDLS1sDwwF3 QMtsxh8ipAFON1RSRgMaLIbAyIhfC7PVD8oDLbAofBwiSE97HMGS84yvCxJW4jYG1qyz WHliJbfcf5TbexOEvVJrPJSvFWSNo77cHVvXazY5cPdRC9cx5qIXYRZjdXfmxdPoLehs vutelibnsAo9Vbujzq9fAV31nAYA2e0N5mmlk/tj2gZqJSPUK+HCdB5C5HnX0Ybsc0iA +PUWqOzHY2Ji+7VyCFq+fI3TvoyVdgR0cfZ7IiVYyQZdN48+3JTs+hh7xOySTr3RiSC1 ZgYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rma54LTYHTS50jlKBPv8ZMRQEEUhyANrM7BxezBwZmQj9SUGyv/BSOgjhXc9HK7gDZ6qHyFX77cRlLg4uu8
X-Received: by 10.107.183.149 with SMTP id h143mr18455420iof.43.1476635345670; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.132.230 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1610161014330.12036@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1610150806380.26951@uplift.swm.pp.se> <c1e14584-a444-37ef-1e4c-d1077ba4f384@bellis.me.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1610151717420.12036@uplift.swm.pp.se> <0A83A7D9-E7E8-4494-86F9-F19AE96967D7@fl1ger.de> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1610151751210.12036@uplift.swm.pp.se> <11BD031F-EDBF-4DF6-A167-0240581EBD0F@apnic.net> <CAN6NTqz1Qk57KWFUio0jY36gkMi+HNmMvH4+PpSF-nhux+UXWg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1610161014330.12036@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:29:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN6NTqxxNyiK75RF1E9FkCH3Cb8D5fqf6HkSwxtXK_GyxCQmNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0cd28c3de9dd053efdf57f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7sra1T2vxg6qgIxIdMN7HOwBJ4o>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ECDSA woes
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 16:29:08 -0000

I will be happy to do that,  stay tuned as I need to create a special
signer for it :-)

Olafur


On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016, Ólafur Guðmundsson wrote:
>
> I have domains signed by all combinations of signing algorithms and DS
>> digests as well as Nsec variants
>> Ds-n.alg-m-nsec.dnssec-test.org
>>
>> Replace n with 1..4
>> M with 1..14
>> Nsec is one of Nsec nsec3 none
>>
>
> I'd be veryinterested if you could create an algorithm called "99" (or
> something), and we could test that. Anyone not loading the "99" resource is
> violating the "SHOULD", even if they understand ECDSA.
>
> This would investigate ratio of problems when we want to introduce a new
> algorithm in the future.
>
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email