IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 19 June 2020 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181933A0EC1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TitDnodc3Fiw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693713A0EBD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49pXsT5tyGzMxB; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 00:04:45 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1592604285; bh=8ncpeIFrc+f9AocK9mAJE/kPMYW875nde5GxUdJWg90=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=C1yff+xueFWJ5e+MZMFdrZUZx54pK5hQ6dzFxhZE8g6mCFabofpTbrqFf+gsvV23C BZToFGtsJ22yL/7W1h7RLtXzxVu12vzGgIAAh+SUXqAt/qRgD2zLSpD2Z7xXt5pA6W pqmDQ2gCBKMc8P1wB+tGgbmSZnM3MeBZt5hKABiU=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jLfdRuYTFfdm; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 00:04:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 20 Jun 2020 00:04:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A13D16020EF2; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9723566AA1; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:04:43 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3ACE7F4C-1E7C-4C79-A3AF-9141B181098E@ogud.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.22.394.2006191802410.20564@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+H4713BnZDntTuVW0FrO59zZ9NFJ=J=n9JFFq2zmfy2pQ@mail.gmail.com> <A930F8C6-9C33-4933-AC37-579ACEF5B325@ogud.com> <7FF83D52-F20B-4FF2-82AA-416835FCA5F4@isc.org> <CADqLbzJsJ6etv-eZuabLsMO4g+XYgktgpuP-fTNSi1cFTwdOGg@mail.gmail.com> <68eb8413-8704-40a3-9765-7eb19ebd0e78@www.fastmail.com> <CABcZeBORz-ustvXvrYaMm15rAHUfA3zR8Sr3ZscLWB6YJ6-s8w@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+EOcTWX6PrbQUmqM6=Z442bE7itFAG6No0b9MZdcARbOg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOwxO6=Qpoyk=_cDsP5G__3CfjKV8p+boGY4-9OX=Gh8w@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Ge7AmGKT3PZ9SQDkHWi9315T=xbLcx4vQ23e=4T=zmNg@mail.gmail.com> <C2C9BDB4-AA7B-47B8-8735-2A529B37B4BA@icann.org> <CADqLbzLdu-ceWDKk5aUYTe3WzAntJKh5QTncHyy137W=nyDSfQ@mail.gmail.com> <7269525A-5376-48AA-B9DC-84BE9D84BA36@icann.org> <3ACE7F4C-1E7C-4C79-A3AF-9141B181098E@ogud.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7vubSjHjpQHDp8Yh_c8wrxX6ayg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 22:04:51 -0000

On Fri, 19 Jun 2020, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:

>> It might be better, and faster, for this WG to adopt a one-paragraph draft that makes the DS registry "RFC required", like the other DNSSEC-related registries.
> You are proposing a bureaucratic solution without thinking about the operational implications of it.
> The hardest part to update in DNS tree right now is uploading DS records to the parents, keeping the list of algorithms down helps avoid operational problems


On the contrary, lets make that list change every month, so registrars
and registries stop doing weird requirements on DS.

Or advocate for ICANN contractual updates for mandatory CDS support :P

Anyway, nothing of this is related to new algortihms and should not be
conflated with it.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email