[DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sun, 12 March 2017 11:10 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE01128874 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 04:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yf3wp6MMJ335 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 04:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7510312706D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 04:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4ED2CFD8; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 13:10:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8P_esBwuV17F; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 13:10:39 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B73A2CCC1; Sun, 12 Mar 2017 13:10:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FF0EC84B-BF16-4CF9-8F24-BB977F256C0F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 12:10:38 +0100
Message-Id: <4D5675CA-7DA1-4F76-9EAC-25C473EAFEDA@piuha.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7y24e_IYuyazaqHWkPvdivh1nyQ>
Cc: Warren Kumari <wkumari@google.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:10:43 -0000
For what it is worth, reviewed these documents today as an interested individual, and both seem to be OK from my (very limited DNS expertise) perspective. Thanks for your work on this important space. I did have a few mostly editorial comments though. In sutld-ps, Section 3: There are several different types of names in the root of the Domain Namespace: It would be beneficial to phrase this as a problem, as in what issues the fact that there are different types causes. Also in the same section: The RFC 6761 process took more than ten years from beginning to end Was name allocation part really 10x more than the rest of the protocol development? I was not paying much attention to the topic at the time, but I thought there also other issues. Also in fairness, mentioning the .onion process might be a more representative sample. (But I’m not disputing the point of this problem, it is real. Just wondering if we can be more accurate about the description.) Finally, on -alt: For the record, and realising the extensive discussion that the WG has had on these topics, but I was a bit surprised by the choices in -alt to not have a registry and to use “alt” (which I associate with some Usenet groups, showing my age). I’m quite fine with the WG’s recommendations, however. Jari
- [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-i… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-i… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-i… Jari Arkko
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-i… Ralph Droms