From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_FF0EC84B-BF16-4CF9-8F24-BB977F256C0F";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 12:10:38 +0100
Message-Id: <4D5675CA-7DA1-4F76-9EAC-25C473EAFEDA@piuha.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7y24e_IYuyazaqHWkPvdivh1nyQ>
Cc: Warren Kumari <wkumari@google.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
Precedence: list


--Apple-Mail=_FF0EC84B-BF16-4CF9-8F24-BB977F256C0F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252

For what it is worth, reviewed these documents today
as an interested individual, and both seem to be OK
from my (very limited DNS expertise) perspective.

Thanks for your work on this important space.

I did have a few mostly editorial comments though.

In sutld-ps, Section 3:

      There are several different types of names in the root of the
      Domain Namespace:

It would be beneficial to phrase this as a problem, as in what
issues the fact that there are different types causes.

Also in the same section:

     The RFC 6761 process took more than ten years from
     beginning to end

Was name allocation part really 10x more than the rest of
the protocol development? I was not paying much
attention to the topic at the time, but I thought there
also other issues. Also in fairness, mentioning the
.onion process might be a more representative
sample. (But I=92m not disputing the point of this
problem, it is real. Just wondering if we can be more
accurate about the description.)

Finally, on -alt: For the record, and realising the
extensive discussion that the WG has had on
these topics, but I was a bit surprised by the
choices in -alt to not have a registry and to
use =93alt=94 (which I associate with some Usenet
groups, showing my age). I=92m quite fine with the
WG=92s recommendations, however.

Jari


--Apple-Mail=_FF0EC84B-BF16-4CF9-8F24-BB977F256C0F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=iCfc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_FF0EC84B-BF16-4CF9-8F24-BB977F256C0F--