IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 07 September 2017 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0595132F2D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1qPIb-Zshby7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB3E6132968 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.125] (50-1-98-42.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v87El1GB000137 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:47:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-42.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.42] claimed to be [10.32.60.125]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 07:48:08 -0700
Message-ID: <BE766C50-5FFF-45FE-A551-46CE1F530E9B@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170907143239.x4out34m7weaah2u@nic.fr>
References: <20170907143239.x4out34m7weaah2u@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/7y9PJywgXl82G8VTLBNwHjhpGu4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Remarks about draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:48:10 -0000

On 7 Sep 2017, at 7:32, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> The document clearly documents that it will not happen, since it
> requires an entire new process at ICANN.

That is a non sequitur. ICANN regularly creates new processes at the 
request of its communities.

--Paul Hoffman, not speaking for ICANN, but speaking as someone who has 
seen ICANN do this for over a decade

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status