IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec

Paul Ebersman <list-dnsop@dragon.net> Tue, 19 November 2019 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <list-dnsop@dragon.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 680F8120C22; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:20:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U123Hk9zZ79u; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:20:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.dragon.net (mail.dragon.net [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:36::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21290120B79; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fafnir.remote.dragon.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.dragon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9461537401FA; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:20:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fafnir.remote.dragon.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id ED8DD19782BB; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:20:30 +0800 (+08)
Received: from dhcp-83d0.meeting.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fafnir.remote.dragon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E710F19782BA; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:20:30 +0800 (+08)
From: Paul Ebersman <list-dnsop@dragon.net>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <CADyWQ+Gip_1qYv8ZQBBfY3OUFxizOMVMpckQZtZRNu4JJtGnLA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+Gip_1qYv8ZQBBfY3OUFxizOMVMpckQZtZRNu4JJtGnLA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> message dated "Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:47:35 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.7.1; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <33069.1574155230.1@dhcp-83d0.meeting.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:20:30 +0800
Message-Id: <20191119092030.ED8DD19782BB@fafnir.remote.dragon.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8-zwGK2I823rAnC04CKU0_ZJqLM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:21:00 -0000

tjw> This starts a Working Group Last Call for
tjw> draft-ietf-dnsop-multi-provider-dnssec
[...]
tjw> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.

I think this draft is in good shape. We've been using this as validation
of $DAYJOB procs around this area and have not found any holes in the
draft.

I'd support this as a standard.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email