Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-jjmb-sunset4-dns-forwarding-ipv4aas-00.txt

Forgot to add, I am interested in RFC3901bis.

John
+1-484-962-0060

-----Original Message-----
From: John Jason Brzozowski <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 15:01
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "dnsop@ietf.org"
<dnsop@ietf.org>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Fred Baker
<fred@cisco.com>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>, Paul Ebersman
<Paul_Ebersman@cable.comcast.com>, "terry.manderson@icann.org"
<terry.manderson@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for
draft-jjmb-sunset4-dns-forwarding-ipv4aas-00.txt

>Mark this is in part, what we are planning on doing.  However, what we
>want to make sure we had was standards reference(s) that we could point
>implementers to.  Also note this case only pertains to DNS queries that
>are directed at the LAN of the CPE router i.e. 10.0.0.1.  There are other
>use cases that we thought would be valuable to enumerate, including cases
>where hosts are configured with a publicly routable IPv4 DNS server
>address or DNS servers that are in the customer’s premises that are dual
>stacked.  In the later cases assigning only a DNS server IPv6 address
>would have no impact.
>
>John
>+1-484-962-0060
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
>Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 14:37
>Cc: John Jason Brzozowski <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>, Brian
>Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>,
>Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>,
>"sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>, Paul Ebersman
><Paul_Ebersman@cable.comcast.com>, "terry.manderson@icann.org"
><terry.manderson@icann.org>
>Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for
>draft-jjmb-sunset4-dns-forwarding-ipv4aas-00.txt
>
>>
>>Also perhaps we should be looking at RFC3901bis.  Alain, Johan are you
>>interested?
>>
>>Mark
>>
>>In message <20151103052757.DAF2D3BBB299@rock.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews
>>writes:
>>> 
>>> The simplest way to force this is for the ISP to only supply IPv6
>>> recursive recursive servers to the CPE where 464XLAT / MAP* / DS-Lite
>>> is in use.  Also if a DUID is presented over DHCPv4 (RFC 4361) don't
>>> return nameservers.  The CPE device should be getting nameservers
>>> via RA/DHCPv6 in this case.
>>> 
>>> The CPE at this point can only advertise it's own addresses IPv4
>>> address or manually configured addresses.
>>> 
>>> Iterative servers should prefer IPv6.
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> -- 
>>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DNSOP mailing list
>>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>-- 
>>Mark Andrews, ISC
>>1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>>PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>>
>