Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
Mark.Andrews@nominum.com Wed, 09 May 2001 08:09 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se ([192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id EAA01648 for <dnsop-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2001 04:09:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f497iNDi027183 for dnsop-outgoing; Wed, 9 May 2001 09:44:23 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [130.155.191.236]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id f497iELt027175 for <dnsop@cafax.se>; Wed, 9 May 2001 09:44:16 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from nominum.com (localhost.dv.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f497hhv47616; Wed, 9 May 2001 17:43:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@nominum.com)
Message-Id: <200105090743.f497hhv47616@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net>
Cc: dnsop@cafax.se
From: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com
Subject: Re: Should a nameserver know about itself?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 May 2001 16:33:11 +1000." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105091625580.43413-100000@julubu.staff.apnic.net>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 17:43:43 +1000
Sender: owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
> > For those that aren't familar with our DNS operations, we manage in an > automated fashion the reverse delegations for the Asia Pacific Region. > > We've assumed (in writing one of our automated delegation tests) that a > given nameserver is 'responding' if it knows about itself, ie, can supply, > when queried, an A/AAAA/A6 record and/or a PTR record for its own name/IP > address. > > Unfortunately, we're running into a number of delegations that are failing > as the given nameservers fail both of the above tests, ie, the given > nameserver cannot supply any information about itself. > > Is the assumption that a nameserver should have information about itself > correct? The assumption is incorrect. The only time it has to be able to retrieve its own address is when it lives within a domain it serves. It never needs to know its own name. Mark > > -- > Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@apnic.net> +61-7-3367-0490 > Systems Administrator APNIC > -- Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc. 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Nathan Jones
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Woodcock
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Randy Bush
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? itojun
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Sam Trenholme
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Checks performed during delegation. Bruce Campbell
- Re: Checks performed during delegation. Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mark.Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? James Raftery
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Jim Reid
- Re: draft-durand-ngtrans-dns-issues-00.txt Robert Elz