Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E028112D2D0 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 04:10:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.4 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nic.fr Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aPdqpwQOi3Ul for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 04:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.nic.fr (mx1.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:10::51:1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637FD112D2CB for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 04:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (mx1.nic.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.nic.fr (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 52N4fCRn023469 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:10:51 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nic.fr; h=content-transfer-encoding : content-type : date : from : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : references : subject : to; s=nic-20240601; bh=K4w02szD5ep3rdwKxEzr3Ajqu04JJ6tXMPGOzDJrEJo=; b=WN5tiwkq7opvZumZObpoW+p8WseFkpgiDL4Lgwq03zXVFFtQWohCXrxrxlFraELiebZd 1728M/L2CWl5gpCqGZweYHl1JtBcqvqLqFv5Xldb/QzB+pQ9EaWuVezCOoaoKwomM0Ke 1lwMs4/5Ct1X+LIlX6J6QYgx/tdKQT2zThRb30QNqarU8eum7RaW1d8Tl/fSpkXGOPsZ zTLuHeC98vwJXfYn/zArsXagHdKq9fsyw4T2/7Q4Zy8+O+my9GHySUISvjP57A+oWCMQ QoDlDh+yy5PAef1J1qwd7AVhrzycGwnS9bFJTa0Rsyric1LSpqxH/RGtL1uE+gM7v6GD Gw== Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [10.1.50.11]) by mx1.nic.fr (PPS) with ESMTP id 45jbg002n2-1 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 11:10:51 +0000 Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.users.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:4001::23:32]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0542C60B3E8A for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 12:10:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E572E40076; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 12:10:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 12:10:50 +0100 From: Stephane Bortzmeyer To: dnsop@ietf.org Message-ID: References: <174272792985.1395281.17718051637478587071@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <174272792985.1395281.17718051637478587071@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z> X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 12.9 X-Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-31-amd64 x86_64 X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie Organization: NIC France X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/ X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: XQPsDHOPImQZeWEQZuhkXo52gh0mbvVC X-Proofpoint-GUID: XQPsDHOPImQZeWEQZuhkXo52gh0mbvVC Message-ID-Hash: CUANVZE5SFFOK3ZTRDC7HMZ4FXQ3EVSY X-Message-ID-Hash: CUANVZE5SFFOK3ZTRDC7HMZ4FXQ3EVSY X-MailFrom: bortzmeyer@nic.fr X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BDNSOP=5D_Re=3A_I-D_Action=3A_draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-poisonlicio?= =?utf-8?q?us-00=2Etxt?= List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 04:05:29AM -0700, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote a message of 36 lines which said: > Title: Synchronizing caches of DNS resolvers > Authors: Stéphane Bortzmeyer > Willem Toorop > Babak Farrokhi > Moin Rahman > Name: draft-bortzmeyer-dnsop-poisonlicious-00.txt This proposal, which comes from a project at the DNS hackathon last week-end, may be of interest for this group. > Network of cooperating and mutually trusting DNS resolvers could > benefit from cache sharing, where one resolver would distribute the > result of a resolution to other resolvers. This document > standardizes a protocol to do so.