Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Thu, 29 September 2016 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329EF12B1F4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vxYyZYd20gDh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AA3B12B204 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 65871 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2016 17:08:44 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=1014e.57ed4a9c.k1609; bh=uET98vSBE0JUNBSqeNZyiSE+jPLDgQufG/GnYQ1ZGGg=; b=RNH8IEpoxhiITBgDUGdzIdYTWo73ztcs1V1cEcjtIQ14wZVoFyLTj/h4yTQo/Rj9cvBht5gxnVy1fsN0JjMiyWgQMK+5r2v3duX8rQx3+8lnmYy690+hOuB15yR+yV9QhBq+1zd0vGPGx8SBwUA5hB7GQOFzGCw8GHqqQZQ91/p0Uzc62ZZd9jWDf/kBOfyl35fbE5aw6DtFQ3xdBfMXDV/mfbsea6t3q2CO9iYmQ+QJGO+FtVFO1ERXKg8B4SO+
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 29 Sep 2016 17:08:43 -0000
Date: 29 Sep 2016 13:08:45 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609291308110.84794@ary.qy>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8BsPEP70tD2EFplPRXoJX-svnlM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:09:11 -0000

>If the process was a success, we would have had the other candidates go 
>through as well. The process was a failure because it has been rather 
>arbitrary - which is why it needed to close down as it did.

Some of us think that the process worked OK, and the other candidates
don't meet the requirements that .onion did.

This isn't to argue that 6761 is perfect, but that we have little
agreement on if or how it's broken.

R's,
John