IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 20 July 2017 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C9C12ECCB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BPoCJuvWLwLD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D25B126557 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id AE9EC31C6A; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:57:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5ADA8EC0B75; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:56:46 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:56:46 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170720075646.GB970@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <149916854131.16079.9203202983727964007.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <149916854131.16079.9203202983727964007.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8OGJyTbNQzwyB9hUNR-IquOOaUU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:57:24 -0000

On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 04:42:21AM -0700,
 IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote 
 a message of 11 lines which said:

> The DNSOP WG has placed draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption

Did anyone was brave enough to make a detailed comparison between this
draft and other proposals like draft-yao-dnsop-accompanying-questions?

(I was thinking myself of writing a draft on a ultra-simple proposal,
allowing QDCOUNT to be > 1 but forcing all QNAMEs to be identical, but
I never got time.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email