Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

"Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com> Sat, 22 July 2017 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6D6129A9F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 14:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K3lcGj5DVfwc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 14:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lxomp52w.centurylink.com (lxomp52w.centurylink.com [155.70.50.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 749F512009C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 14:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lxdnp04n.corp.intranet (lxdnp04n.corp.intranet [151.119.92.83]) by lxomp52w.centurylink.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6MLUvxg043307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:30:57 -0500
Received: from lxdnp04n.corp.intranet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lxdnp04n.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6MLUpPG011278; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 15:30:51 -0600
Received: from lxomp06u.corp.intranet (lxdnp23m.corp.intranet [151.119.92.134]) by lxdnp04n.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6MLUpef011271 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 15:30:51 -0600
Received: from lxomp06u.corp.intranet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lxomp06u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6MLUpvJ004482; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:30:51 -0500
Received: from vodcwhubex502.ctl.intranet (vodcwhubex502.ctl.intranet [151.117.206.28]) by lxomp06u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id v6MLUp4D004479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:30:51 -0500
Received: from PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet ([169.254.1.120]) by vodcwhubex502.ctl.intranet ([151.117.206.28]) with mapi id 14.03.0339.000; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:30:51 -0500
From: "Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
To: "'Stephane Bortzmeyer'" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
CC: "Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Thread-Index: AQHTAAPw+UbndOaHcUud70v4A7K1OaJdKUGAgAM4cJA=
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 21:30:50 +0000
Message-ID: <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD08245D9@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet>
References: <150040947342.11401.6673996996138598307.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170720151325.GB22702@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170720151325.GB22702@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [151.117.206.8]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8X7EXZ0XTCOSFL1F_HftC1EHs1Q>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 21:30:59 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DNSOP [mailto:dnsop-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephane Bortzmeyer
>

Hi Stéphane,

Thanks again for your comments and encouragement.

>
> > The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state Candidate for
> > WG Adoption (entered by Tim Wicinski)
> >
> > The document is available at
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-woodworth-bulk-rr/
>
> I've read it and, while I'm not convinced it can be implemented
> properly (I would like to see running code),
>

We are working on this at the moment.

>
> I think there is a clear demand for that and that the solution
> is reasonable. I therefore support its adoption. (Of course,
> as always, it does not mean I will support the result at the end.)
>

Thanks.

>
> I'm still hesitant with the NPN feature.
>

Understood.

>
> I would like the draft to be modified to make clearer that it
> is non-mandatory to support BULK. For instance, setcion 3's
> "When an authoritative nameserver receives a query for which
> it does not have a matching name or a covering wildcard, it
> MUST then look for BULK RRs"
> should be replaced by "When a *BULK-aware* authoritative
> nameserver receives a query for which it does not have a
> matching name or a covering wildcard, …"
>
> Section 3.2.3 "longer values MUST be truncated to the width"
> Left-truncated or right-truncated?
>

I would like to have a discussion with you sometime about this.


Thanks,
John

-- THESE ARE THE DROIDS TO WHOM I REFER:
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any attachments.