[DNSOP] Fwd: RZERC Draft Documents For Review
Tim April <ietf@tapril.net> Fri, 18 December 2020 21:26 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@tapril.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910233A07D1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:26:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1JlatbVh53tt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-f50.google.com (mail-qv1-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3013A07C8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:26:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-f50.google.com with SMTP id s6so1614361qvn.6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:26:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version; bh=HuBq2G15B5rkiZk+Roayapb7EzhZeuOVgQeqgjsgYsA=; b=Ha4hVKfwYg/ToxR6QBXhMfFW0NhH+2b3+d76wYUyJgLoY4DP5HZKAgf6RFY/QuzkZC yZXKRn1UIbobbvjmq16dYeRCAYhfZJpKLgu9X4bsBeibQWjV44KaOxehk7SCUzuYcbhr CB14QHBjnmUU/S0SNeKSCUaNFYa/4fJ4/ko1+qthKAEDoDO7XU9Xmn6jnB7pbaFIcGHF mbxSmVvfnCLMAlDieuKiXk863UiEONayExgvc2Y/EzbjAHQ+99F3rA5Dxv8N9vKuF0Ml Qf0jPknqynvphig2bZ+P9i5Q71jWr34C6Uap7hGCtdjhz2DSccJJQHukjlH7MutekRib bqXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tW49O1JRyW7lKJZ/63RQAPv+YKOaXZLb9Fv3tK8mfq/W1K47U wB5mMkNjjCW7vWIWHSGrw68CHO6dm36jRg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzrUm7wj+lKifevgrAfO570J1YkkcI4qN3hERZQq/E5Zl4KXtkLQDDxZTg2slNMlsqvAFL+pg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:184a:: with SMTP id d10mr6468860qvy.41.1608326766920; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:26:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [100.64.0.1] (c-73-60-229-39.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.60.229.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d123sm6715367qke.95.2020.12.18.13.26.04 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:26:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Tim April <ietf@tapril.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:26:04 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5676)
Message-ID: <E0AB68A6-83B9-4ACB-AD6A-24A8A435E039@tapril.net>
References: <1EC6E61D-BD80-43EB-9A86-13191889AE20@tapril.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_MailMate_2CCB1E3C-E4E3-4020-8A5D-210FE1605B5F_="
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8YeawPAA_2mHHVA_oRZ4VJxrCvA>
Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: RZERC Draft Documents For Review
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 21:26:12 -0000
Hello DNSOP, Forwarding along to DNSOP as well. If you have any comments or feedback on the two proposed RZERC documents, please let me know by January 15th. Thanks, --tim Forwarded message: > From: Tim April <ietf@tapril.net> > To: ietf@ietf.org > Cc: iab@iab.org > Subject: RZERC Draft Documents For Review > Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:49:06 -0500 > > Hello IETF, > > I wanted to provide a quick update on the work going on in the RZERC. > We have been discussing and iterating on the two documents attached > and we have reached the point where we would like to gather feedback > from the various constituencies represented in the RZERC. As your > local member, I will be collecting any feedback on the documents ahead > of our next meeting on the 19th of January. If possible, please > provide any feedback here or directly to me the 15th of January. > > Document 1: Recommendations Regarding Signing Root Zone Name Server > Data - This document outlines the benefits and potential concerns > related to signing the root-servers.net zone. It recommends that the > ICANN org conduct studies into the impact that signing the > root-servers.net zone might have. > > Document 2: Adding Zone Data Protections to the Root Zone - This > document discusses recommends that the Root Server Operators, Public > Technical Identifiers and the Root Zone Maintainer do the necessary > work to create a plan for deploying > [ZONEMD](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest/), > ensuring that it would not negatively impact the distribution of the > zone data to the Root Server System. It also recommends that the DNS > and Internet community be notified of the changes all under the > assumption that draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest becomes an RFC. > > Again, if you have any comments or feedback on the documents, please > provide them be January 15th. > > --tim
- [DNSOP] Fwd: RZERC Draft Documents For Review Tim April
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: RZERC Draft Documents For Review Ben Schwartz
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: RZERC Draft Documents For Review Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] RZERC Draft Documents For Review Tim April