Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: Message Digest for DNS Zones

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Wed, 08 January 2020 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988D3120047 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 10:58:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9wRdAgt5zeKD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 10:58:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72a.google.com (mail-qk1-x72a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E826212003E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 10:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72a.google.com with SMTP id z76so3662060qka.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:58:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=2tNpsmtw/Py0eyHlKp1D5WPGRdxkvw9dL9XVuV/fHis=; b=Zh7QBIIvQZTmnuKO0te1UD9dSLvzoPBbnVLp/q0Hsny88N/uYm7iOlKqTxyyu0G8+w hs/tebsdd9Nnw8+rCi+HhFkYpIedQMLyvm6GlSUja3HC5ri5n3g0if12QeuBMXLOilmc hPxnXhDtnY5I7xmIel4GvEg4gjxb1IAjbFIzLQUw2RdOVPVsFLnc24xjOM4yQ6BYPzZG k1BrEm3LsvxTzTZlXSX6Qrao7PUq5PKgzyWxUl85dG4XSvsmeVV8ZwArEr5Wsfd/MKS9 cL+3+MRqSS36/M92onmi2ZDcQox60v8GofnBurUFWlPlguIBhLal1vs18A8VpljujCis C6Mw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=2tNpsmtw/Py0eyHlKp1D5WPGRdxkvw9dL9XVuV/fHis=; b=rjCcx4o69F46TYTZsIKMlaFj9sz4Fioag26Q+Uh8nysnr+8AtbMKne4RUMCn3THvrp nyoLyWRCw8EdlvJ0FlBOnzB6YvluZWQMbgEElkesJJ1G5La8C5DTLFUHQKJfm/ezVhAe /+RH5LK6PkyqZkRe519HuVfRC1bRlBWxyqgLkLV/dPFjRv+nUy8iA49hhUcB22miEXSr xDjt6OpVUrMlDPdlUNWeZeu8pPW/FVLiDgjbFwZhM/7Q7oCKROAVDuMGHNfpNVZ39kWt Y2KPb3a4NEJI4DyckeCt/pmmlfJUseqlO5P4Gx+1Mw4PIPts7fZ+2a5fN0+dMxyzskI7 yR1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAq5C04Qm1CaFTndtn3fkX0EpETYH8OvF5zI+d2+ExtywQ1sdi 4ByfKNx/zkUxd038tFQ3UtQj+0qaiXI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyt7EOljKx/RQWdAualIi99ors2RbGRwKOqDihoMux70pIFFUxvUgD71FBo2eZDavNBc5KmAw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:e408:: with SMTP id y8mr5743715qkf.39.1578509890736; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:dd4:4ade:7d8:f573? ([2601:152:4400:437c:dd4:4ade:7d8:f573]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1sm1772868qkm.84.2020.01.08.10.58.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:58:10 -0800 (PST)
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20200107023630.628251208AAF@ary.qy>
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Message-ID: <ce52989c-f6cc-f4e5-0c49-d528d366e350@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:58:09 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200107023630.628251208AAF@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8cLowyy4bOP7y59OqAKrqc273BA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: Message Digest for DNS Zones
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:58:14 -0000

On 1/6/2020 9:36 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <7f298591-09b5-dd7c-0dab-afc60def874b@nthpermutation.com> you write:
>> OK.� The point is not to self-approve, but to get a few other
>> non-authors to actually see if they can figure out what you're talking
>> about here and whether they're ever going to see this use case.��� E.g.
>> reach out to the consumer side for each of the 4 cases and see if you
>> can get some idea of a) would they actually use this, and b) what would
>> they do if validation failed or succeeded?
> Hi again.  I actually do cases 1.3.1, 1.3.2, and 1.3.4 and would use
> ZONEMD in all of them, particularly if someone else wrote the verification software.
> (I never said I wasn't lazy.)
>
> In my applications I don't think performance would be an issue.
>
> R's,
> John

Hi John -

Could you give me a b) for each of these please?   E.g. How does ZONEMD 
make your life better in each of these and what would happen if you - in 
a future world - were getting ZONEMD data and validation failed?

Later, Mike