Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 08 May 2020 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B553A09EE; Thu, 7 May 2020 17:16:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CPAiFjpIE15u; Thu, 7 May 2020 17:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53213A09C7; Thu, 7 May 2020 17:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id c124so6700425oib.13; Thu, 07 May 2020 17:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=15VAFp7DDUNk/S4KCmwPYy/hnnzQsJYHL19qWW4j8aw=; b=ay8cewsU/O3PG3ANMtRon3Uu23dNbXHIvjYCnRj5AnR3r4XUmzGgVgM+ZbIuglSmuL WLd7W+VNWYUQ/zbdLblPjcKq9ar4k868gvxZnMtcWuqoX3P7dVwHJNBwgvK+SwE00QQE +6yN7dLRQTw3udpytFXmows2lZuXa5O8s087sWrKbLfm6ekcGj6cMsMB9e8X9iI7OY51 ujmkvplsLpLQTdM6qIgQXDjpamJ2FPCvwvnP78FHoaXF7ahuJegpPopSTdAQeT7PY/1Q ilejnU2XUUZgNUJRZHeofNjxCQna+9HsViPdyVj69hGjRJzguhdbu0H3UiWZsfMDBlZS JjKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=15VAFp7DDUNk/S4KCmwPYy/hnnzQsJYHL19qWW4j8aw=; b=BIbec/qQCf5Xmz+r8RiEJ9C6jyo9Yv043QUxP/zzubC30uqNm3CxVMhDPfMzgLo4fr 1G9rJbShEjWy1FH7S91sbfsjniiuH2wVYoG3sslIO3tVYEtDxxMS5ut0QwcU7bWgzA7I vTw2ipCY3aWTG32fHT5lQ4mX8ZyjuRkGebAYTwUniAKhF+YHmclk5hATXSxgY7JgQ1mA S+RznREKh0JyvN3puNNV1AGpg7+RoPM5jSRU1YDoben5wo6ScFOP9fWKB81E3QDCPPbV M5AnPSQz4xM7S5G0tZHz2ViTScffJ/oPpE/oltg97m742KNo3VKvkKJpj3wjVjpPkZB1 smUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaFi7DqJYb0Wd3vIKaQM+onFHML9Jid2N+4Kwb9N16jWAODKhHN pR0MVCB3LRB3A0Es8KIjVKI8fMk7646YZnqHdJs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKu3Vlo61AWAV/eXnmkJgPH28+oT/DZqAWZCWHAKWIcepaZwkAmynAGgUYzUHNTvaJeE+CqrcbYLU5RgNIG9hM=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ac84:: with SMTP id v126mr8922197oie.132.1588896976943; Thu, 07 May 2020 17:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+HTU92FYYFvogsur9jSZ+qj03PWPVNbiWSe4g_zCn=5wg@mail.gmail.com> <B9147976-F79F-4AD6-966D-5FC8A948A024@hopcount.ca> <CADZyTkkOLExUbJ=EPbjcTVR8D8aZpdpsic-S=hGN9MkoBED_BQ@mail.gmail.com> <42A20E19-C43C-4093-8483-07B0A85386E3@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <42A20E19-C43C-4093-8483-07B0A85386E3@hopcount.ca>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 20:16:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+H8w6UPmhgNyL69WdCVKDbaEV_ufJ8_VLSgrug1Cb8CpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Cc: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e5404805a517e7a3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8gNMcGlwTIMK98DiA5X2pO9JzY0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 00:16:46 -0000

Daniel

Thanks for taking Joe's draft under advice and I agree there is work to be
collaborated on.

Tim
(speaking as a chair)

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:42 PM Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 7 May 2020, at 15:39, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for putting the reference of that draft. I have always thought
> that the draft you were mentioning was the one that became RFC7958.
>
> 7958 came from draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor, but the confusion is
> entirely reasonable!
>
> > The current draft mentions that TA should be associated with
> bootstrapping mechanism and that boostrapping for the root zone should be
> extended to other TA.
>
> Yep.
>
> > There are clearly some overlap between the two drafts and I also have
> the impression the drafts can be merged.
> > the following issue has been opened:
> >
> https://github.com/mglt/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/issues/7
>
> Happy to help with that if it's something that the authors/working group
> decide is useful.
>
> I support adoption of this draft, now that I've read it properly.
>
>
> Joe
>