Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz

Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> Sun, 08 January 2017 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <avri@acm.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F145D129411 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:26:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.445
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.445 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5eQnX7RBk4OP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0171.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D521296A9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 12:26:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CE412BA13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:26:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Session-Marker: 6176726940646F7269612E6F7267
X-Spam-Summary: 2, -10, 0, , d41d8cd98f00b204, avri@acm.org, :, RULES_HIT:41:355:379:599:800:854:967:973:988:989:1042:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1381:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1683:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2525:2553:2565:2682:2685:2692:2859:2911:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4184:4250:4425:4860:5007:6119:7652:7903:8660:8985:9010:9025:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12043:12050:12109:12291:12379:12438:12683:12740:12760:12895:13019:13069:13071:13146:13148:13149:13230:13311:13357:13846:13891:14096:14097:14180:14181:14721:14764:14777:14819:21060:21063:21080:21212:21366:21433:21451:30022:30029:30054:30060:30090, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:fp, MSBL:0, DNSBL:none, Custom_rules:0:0:0, LFtime:2, LUA_SUMMARY:none
X-HE-Tag: blow11_1bfa561c3df63
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2689
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [23.82.54.75]) (Authenticated sender: avri@doria.org) by omf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2017 20:26:32 +0000 (UTC)
References: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
Organization: Technicalities
Message-ID: <4ebfa099-c621-4fdf-db56-05b9e27c4d58@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 15:26:05 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+ETSd199ok0fgh=PB=--hW7buPgSoCg22aK51Bk4xxBmw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 170102-0, 01/02/2017), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8hfrZXJDGMrbvaYvhyiZBA-OnWo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption draft-vixie-dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: avri@acm.org
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 20:26:38 -0000

Hi,

Finally had a chance to read all of it.  While I understand that it can
be used to create enclaves, I think it can also be used in useful ways
to increase the flexibility of the DNS system, e.g. for example possibly
to avoid some of the problems we see from occasional name collision.

I would very much like to see it well documented.  And if it is
politically too difficult to standardize, informational is good enough.

avri



On 20-Dec-16 10:16, tjw ietf wrote:
> Why not just wade into this discussion...
>
> The draft is being present as "Informational", and the point here is
> to document current working behavior in the DNS (for the past several
> years).   It is obvious that some feel this draft is a large mistake,
> but like edns-client-subnet, more operators are deploying this than
> one is aware of. 
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-vixie-dns-rpz
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vixie-dns-rpz/
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
> adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
> With the holiday period upon us, we'll make this a three week call for
> adoption. This call for adoption ends on 10 January 2017
>
> Thanks,
> tim wicinski
> DNSOP co-chair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
avri@ella.com is going out of use in the near future.
Please switch to avri@acm.org


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus