Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTTP in dnsop?
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 23 December 2015 05:28 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71BD1AC437 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:28:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30uusFBf-HOH for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDC991AC430 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:28:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l133so140334962lfd.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:28:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Imd64mjkn6V7gItcvX8TbR7eSeTfLYON/MgJlLuGDQ0=; b=RLSlEbMISGmcZfX5fqfonqvdHunSf8zYVtmUHO1iDegiCyMULGb0wBNDRXizj4j/le rPw3FqUlCRZmDd/TT9iOr6LJ4MjuNuAlf9rSC7XLWuu/PEO8aTzDRdTWr6FpMZDVFBYM Z0rTkdde5XVbhXQcm7aIZzwVcJ0pAHJdvQluoCqalkzDRHM8i8Cu3Xgch57CYRJA/tSO g3ImMQ2HEvWLoLQbxn9+kvOLMsu3pt1nj1pP/xuLK0/rWpSRhH2I0Hc1tO9DD1p8osNx 2Kh0W7ZBAzfbt5B1aW+L7Joc6bccPbe269UCr851OvtaBRMaNl9p3BZYDSsPc/6OOL+J 1jTg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.206.132 with SMTP id e126mr7691449lfg.39.1450848482012; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:28:02 -0800 (PST)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.1.33 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:28:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1999760.RBe1cJlAWr@linux-85bq.suse>
References: <20151217020754.6915b71c@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <1999755.oExeQdjcfZ@linux-85bq.suse> <20151220220358.52594.qmail@f5-external.bushwire.net> <1999760.RBe1cJlAWr@linux-85bq.suse>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:28:01 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: p64jCO6_Wzm8QXz4hCpWYvoPpfQ
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwidgX3vNV77rhukd7n-OQE6kVO5ickQXX7ZYC_6FYtPfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8j2-07HTHvM96LdPl6xzM8ZKmiE>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Mark Delany <f4t@november.emu.st>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTTP in dnsop?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 05:28:05 -0000
If you want to do this... Why not just do Web Sockets and run plain old DNS over TCP. Its not going to be tremendously fast but it is the shortest distance between two points and there would be almost no new code needed.
- [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTTP in… Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Robert Edmonds
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Mark Delany
- [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we try to… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we tr… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we tr… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we tr… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] "anything goes" (was Re: Should we tr… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTT… Tony Finch