Re: [DNSOP] my dnse vision (A+E vs E)

"Hosnieh Rafiee" <ietf@rozanak.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@rozanak.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 479EA1A05C3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:40:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5E1oQC3ts0Kz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:40:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.rozanak.com (mail.rozanak.com [IPv6:2a01:238:42ad:1500:aa19:4238:e48f:61cf]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBFB1A053B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C45423E2D59; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 17:40:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rozanak.com
Received: from mail.rozanak.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.iknowlaws.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7i3iH-v6PVSv; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:40:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from kopoli (f052010124.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.52.10.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rozanak.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17E6F23E2D58; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:40:20 +0100 (CET)
From: "Hosnieh Rafiee" <ietf@rozanak.com>
To: "'Francis Dupont'" <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>, <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <201403051730.s25HUfBV094232@givry.fdupont.fr>
In-Reply-To: <201403051730.s25HUfBV094232@givry.fdupont.fr>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:40:17 +0100
Message-ID: <01b901cf3899$f94ba630$ebe2f290$@rozanak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLGRWkK9MbSKGbsc+MTkhuu451/r5jkp3LA
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8jGoSn04T7n6VtedWJE1RH0Euws
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] my dnse vision (A+E vs E)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:40:27 -0000

BTW it (the overhead) will be likely bigger in the query than in the
> response so we should not get new amplification concerns.

Amplification happens when IP spoofing is possible. When the solution stop
IP spoofing, I guess, it cannot happen as well.

Hosnieh