Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-00.txt

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Tue, 04 April 2017 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9740E1294F4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id il49tgJ383dc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x234.google.com (mail-yb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF881294BF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l201so47769020ybf.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 13:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LQdElVNgAWRn5As8+/LrM/TjjEEHyNUdcGn3upfARNU=; b=ABbI0p9ckneqrnny3k+pieF5AOqdD0fFAzJ1uI72cSKofLQaNolfdVEcGkt64dzECw B6EXAjLTAk/9BezSDj5gue8LotF4ejxWqZYqALZaSfF8ulPW2h3UQ+VpuPwsV0jpdlNy oBXlim3YOG47dAsyc6nVz5flRIQRUZ1sogA170cN8qxJWFMg+b+gmzjQkntOz4lILWSz vRE6nQsGdkW7UBUYlMzzH6GrwpshF4N5i9o0747i1PGdSH6KUQN810baCVbvRbWT7lpw P6qx/XCT8Pd50Sl0CvaAtBbY5NRy0kOHqO71QHkWVobCERn0srk/ancKSXaRYL7lo9vP a38Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=LQdElVNgAWRn5As8+/LrM/TjjEEHyNUdcGn3upfARNU=; b=BaoxwsZZl9+AuWM1Ec7+7HmfYWOco270MKgXTFBMpuuMNIAWywuIWqz/uH0KLgG0hF eHwRJxJRg87CmUKPGMX38IM4/PCnc6aMiZf7QvTNyuKyYqZ2P18W6kWXbmUwk152OTxV cwbB8tLQXHJZ4MB7U0Ro3fUw++pMvn8hzcmzKBduEvdTYR3uP89UNN1vEppXOllXMclc vFPajzHBZo5yXRT4URAmNfYtqtVh0H73Tea35I3adEX1j+2WK4ZYtfReWKaE/dY+dS88 8wGOANnAahu3UtumhBloYFDQeU4Ox6K+saB/JVhbB7kXm5eF0d+Lx7QBLMhUWZLro6oo 4sRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2raSdLg0ikh96JCsORxoX31WNms5Hdb2LucRS85W6fIjEnCDMwpOpaOtgVfLuYi8xtl66JV4W22FS3priF
X-Received: by 10.37.217.15 with SMTP id q15mr14834516ybg.23.1491337687413; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 13:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.109.134 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <149130746853.30870.8028044269482471265@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <149130746853.30870.8028044269482471265@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:28:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8BeT=4PKyi-ZH3NXTvZZdDkrSuBqjcAJYCG1aFmv4FPdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c05fd82194707054c5d1d4f
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8nkyFO0qnG8mdDnLgTrdxFFtgnU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 20:28:12 -0000

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 8:04 AM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Security Considerations for RFC5011 Publishers
>         Authors         : Wes Hardaker
>                           Warren Kumari
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-
> security-considerations-00.txt
>         Pages           : 9
>         Date            : 2017-04-03
>
> Abstract:
>    This document describes the math behind the minimum time-length that
>    a DNS zone publisher must wait before using a new DNSKEY to sign
>    records when supporting the RFC5011 rollover strategies.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-
> security-considerations/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-
> security-considerations-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-
> considerations-00
>
>
This one still needs to be fixed:

----------
"6. Minimum RFC5011 Timing Requirements
...
The most confusing element of the above equation comes from the "3 *
   (DNSKEY RRSIG Signature Validity) / 2" element, but is the most
   critical to understand and get right."
-----------

But the equation no longer contains "3 * " anywhere.

-- 
Bob Harold