Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List

Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> Tue, 10 June 2008 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E1828C122; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2122828C168 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.852, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c6fr6yOhB0cW for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B3B28C106 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [80.229.30.161] (helo=[192.168.1.6]) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1K60o3-0003rP-BP; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:10:23 +0100
Message-ID: <484E530E.1040108@mozilla.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:10:22 +0100
From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (X11/2008050714)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kim Davies <kim.davies@icann.org>
References: <C472CDE5.34D8%kim.davies@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <C472CDE5.34D8%kim.davies@icann.org>
X-Plusnet-Relay: 2b182193a2ff7d9ac8f9f8e285076112
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

Kim Davies wrote:
> This thread sounds remarkably like deja vu. Indeed, the TLD community was
> rather upset a few years ago by Mozilla taking unilateral action to
> introduce a hard-coded white-list of acceptable IDN TLDs without prior
> consultation. 

That's unfortunate; but I must say this upset was not communicated to me.

That policy of ours should have no effect whatsoever on TLDs with a
responsible attitude to homographs. Our registration requirements are
not onerous.

Gerv
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop