Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-muks-dnsop-dnssec-sha3-00.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 06 April 2017 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95661294E6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id luhUA3vSCYwH for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D93C1294BC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:42391) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1cw6vk-000lBH-0O (Exim 4.89) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:54:28 +0100
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 13:54:28 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Jelte Jansen <jelte.jansen@sidn.nl>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <1f3601da-b93c-410e-fe8e-4b85ff0519f4@sidn.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1704061352550.28335@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20170405084256.GA22692@jurassic> <39B58207-4CC2-420B-B774-2766FC80B194@vpnc.org> <20170405145010.GA29337@jurassic> <1f3601da-b93c-410e-fe8e-4b85ff0519f4@sidn.nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8qEFDOUK2aawwGV2iSLlr4ni8rE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-muks-dnsop-dnssec-sha3-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 12:54:41 -0000

Jelte Jansen <jelte.jansen@sidn.nl> wrote:
>
> We can certainly discuss alternative schemes, RSASSA-PSS is a potential
> alternative, which I understand is considered (much?) better. It has a
> big drawback though, in that it requires salt, which can be a big issue
> for large deployments.

As I understand it the deterministic DSA trick (RFC 6979) also works for
RSA SSA PSS.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
South Plymouth, North Biscay: Easterly or northeasterly 4 or 5. Moderate,
occasionally rough at first in north Biscay. Fair. Moderate or good.