IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Revised the application for the WALLET RRTYPE

Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> Fri, 05 July 2024 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <shuque@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC1CC1D530D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 06:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E6tI_eBOkUw0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 06:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D600C20797F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 06:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7f38da3800aso66935339f.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 06:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720184437; x=1720789237; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2HMPuNF/JrfdTpEzT0kZ+eDcT33aXxGcf+knX1l98ig=; b=OVeg6z+ESLiB1dB+nvx7e8NI/I4sxPqzrH0d5FjujBBrU2LBZkBrNgyzs7pTxPnGV1 shg8pbnMWkn6c+dngyo033gJ0VsNBLBdWiuBFKE1jlKOuqZW+sXj796ztTW6HjPcGNVP 4Jk2HQ1zlb7woYWd9N3jCM32Pwc1HZf7134tyf7WjJflWLRxCAl0JdGVv2NQ/3AMbhC2 zPBmf8q/xA6JjJzomQWFrvBneNQI4edP2NAVV5s6ULPz7ft35Wt+a5gSs/eloR0dRTK4 2U2XBWbYrSoRE/HU+yX8tngScrvpk7nJglCSxo5kljxuqM9zER/pNv1AUOj/3Bng4pvL CUfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720184437; x=1720789237; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=2HMPuNF/JrfdTpEzT0kZ+eDcT33aXxGcf+knX1l98ig=; b=CFZBy9CRa7acOsrjGXRCayhbhxfpQhrRh8zXIjIHOoVvokjb8XuLD1SXWK35x9QS5a k84LesZ5kgNHxDvkEcNi8OtlWqaFQY0IWPNtV58MH60RRMzVSvWMC47z5SZNqb2SCocZ RCsmbwScNx45bVnj6KLY+9pXJYq0JrlMiJnFGGdl6VCzJFjNy2/ko4Exr+9ONqSYUKDu qXQsLh3ae2wYV6nZiTT7apsIwLnhyt80Kx/r7e3n0S/VJ2NHWGCNRU6bfelTzX7fzzHU SCRFmiJpO/1Djj4DDU/wi+7XyrT+hjLTS6EUdi5aZu2MKh6ZNRPTQhpcGevWxvC6Z4K4 38dA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz9iPoCBtwn1AYlrL4JFdTgZd7SFsaEHkUaZDTOM0frCI/CiY/1 6j9yeLu1tHs8QXeGyGCIp7NYNX99tOKRuuVieFi57BbnaRHbbJuhzUCAwvEcj8FNc2Y6OexGha6 hm4HQWODK3ovhCJdOltiEqz9BO3U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGoZNd2T41S2fmIvL6kcrq2XnHK6Wxi5Rkvj0L+BihSEHUw9LYXP7m64xt9LNB1aQcjkPuwjMVh1c4ogVAJ2m8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:6c08:b0:7f6:5818:b215 with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7f66de601c3mr647283939f.4.1720184437429; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 06:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7FC7E35E-915F-4A29-8AB2-948529F4F1CC@icann.org> <A4681A06-0AAC-4F8A-BB3A-7D61CAB09925@icann.org> <947cb0ad-a1e4-447b-8bdc-214b764b74d7@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <947cb0ad-a1e4-447b-8bdc-214b764b74d7@isc.org>
From: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 09:00:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHPuVdWWAAaudSOLDrO9NFEJV9g31r4oD+dRHZNNK-6MXjWJzg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000575f67061c7fa6de"
Message-ID-Hash: JUIRHJFARQYU4X5IPMZPDFITG6L6MFRM
X-Message-ID-Hash: JUIRHJFARQYU4X5IPMZPDFITG6L6MFRM
X-MailFrom: shuque@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Revised the application for the WALLET RRTYPE
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8qxVTunafZtQOHE-kkARetS1WeQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 8:19 AM Petr Špaček <pspacek@isc.org> wrote:

> On 01. 07. 24 21:20, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > Thanks again for the input on the new RRTYPE. I submitted it to the
> RRTYPE expert reviewers, and the new definition is posted at <
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/WALLET/wallet-completed-template>.
> It has "2024-06-24" as its submission date.
>
> I wonder if it needs some words how to handle wallet addresses longer
> than 255 characters?
>
> Maybe we safely leave this up to the application because the first field
> should identify the type anyway ... Just thinking aloud.
>

I was wondering the same thing earlier, but forgot to chime in about it.

What is the rationale for using "the same definition as the TXT record" for
a new RR type?

In practice applications that use TXT records (like SPF and DKIM) specify
that they must concatenate all the up-to 255 character strings in the TXT
RDATA before use.

Why should a new RR-type be constrained in this way? It should define its
RDATA components to be as large as they need to be.

Shumon.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status