Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-large-resp
神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Thu, 24 January 2019 19:43 UTC
Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719B8128B01 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:43:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIm88NZRIcTn for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:43:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (mail-wr1-f44.google.com [209.85.221.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686711313EE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:43:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id x10so7800749wrs.8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:43:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S+YfJiGd4hH6sOr5soIkOTKpAg+woqxBGVuVydk3i/k=; b=ZD7oqQtzOTNekHb0zKjJa8DacfdU7f5pGE80To/4fsHO6cYEybqfoGLYB9apdJGdXe /X5AmOUZDA6MJOnGp3DU1wRk/qXXM0iZxnSmRk9whZLeUZJ5mP+7p2oXUwbzo0gEsrtq qaZfcz6QoOLmkZ6E9TS2FYF2BPIykAwNhZck7a6YNBsteG79nnlJuAYJKxv02fpGLAKJ VE7Xu3CXfjo3oY6fCXoQt81C8tNg4u4Cbss+zjHHToVzvfmaDgL1tngRhNNL4WyrL4P6 qnaH8gKXvIPdJnsH5SD9r5Q/4jSTwwxV9Nmv1ruMqmtsGKfcKueJsrWhrIGLSyACfIzf K1/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdB1ZQCcg3IflxA8bywv4FUUhh6oldP1OwT/oFlLIGypNxJ+3so E7/YlA+FM+LABqM5VVEmoNw/F4xnwKdBtWpwyEE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6XJzTm73TV7RNvJZ3w54tipNYFqGLTCNf0Z27ZWUX2ncUxapQLwIXx6NhcMxPw0sVVcePWgRrHL2rml31p3PY=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a8e:: with SMTP id o14mr8162201wrq.159.1548359031543; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:43:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BCACF554-8BE6-49BC-B75A-BCED776F5189@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <BCACF554-8BE6-49BC-B75A-BCED776F5189@NLnetLabs.nl>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:43:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqfah10smVJs1YB4R5hAWvpubwb3dOdG0O74KmqO64QsdA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000f61510580396ecd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8xr_LI4aO1kfJJ-cDERIciToJfg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-large-resp
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:43:55 -0000
At Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:55:16 +0100, Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> wrote: > We discussed this work (draft -01) in Montreal, and different opinions wrt. adoption were expressed. In the past months, the authors pushed a draft version -02 that addressed and resolved some of these comments. > > This starts a Call for Adoption for: > draft-song-atr-large-resp > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-song-atr-large-resp/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. I've read draft-song-atr-large-resp-02. I support the adoption of this doc, or at least of *some work* related to the "large response drop" problem, by DNSOP. If adopted I'm willing to review subsequent versions. I don't have empirical measurement results of my own on this topic, but my general understanding of the discussion in the IETF is that the concern (i.e., the bad effects of dropping fragmented large packets) is seriously taken. One of the latest efforts in this sense is draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile, which is currently in an intarea WGLC and talks about DNS implications (btw, those who dismiss atr-large-resp because the concern is FUD may want to comment on intarea-frag-fragile too). The research result cited in draft-song-atr-large-resp (https://blog.apnic.net/2017/08/22/dealing-ipv6-fragmentation-dns) may still be anecdotal and artificial, but it also looks solid and sufficiently broad to draw attention. So I don't agree on dismissing the work "because the problem doesn't exist". I also don't agree on dismissing the work "because it's specific to IPv6" (I don't know if it really is, but even if so), given the commitment by the IETF to IPv6 deployment and related problems. I see it's still debatable whether the particular proposal of "ATR" is a good solution to the problem, however. I admit that's a hack with some obvious adverse effects such as increasing response traffic, so if there's a better, cleaner solution, I'm happy to support that one instead of ATR. One aspect I like about ATR, however, is that it can be deployed without changing resolvers. In that sense I see it as more promising compared to some other proposed DNS hacks, e.g., (the ultimate form of) ANAME. -- JINMEI, Tatuya
- [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-large-r… Benno Overeinder
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Peter van Dijk
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Jim Reid
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… John Dickinson
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Ralph Dolmans
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Paul Vixie
- [DNSOP] 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Davey Song (宋林健)
- Re: [DNSOP] 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr… Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr… Brian Dickson
- [DNSOP] 答复: 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr… Davey Song (宋林健)
- Re: [DNSOP] 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr… Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] 答复: 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Peter van Dijk
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Mukund Sivaraman
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Benno Overeinder
- [DNSOP] 答复: Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-lar… Davey Song (宋林健)