Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Sun, 16 September 2018 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEA212785F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 08:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lR6XbfnCBXfU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 08:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34C05120072 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 08:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.79.203] (unknown [96.47.147.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 154BF892C6; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 15:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5B9E7CB3.1040500@redbarn.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 08:54:27 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.25 (Windows/20180328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@mukund.org>
CC: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ciDFoHBhxI1law==?= <petr.spacek@nic.cz>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <b73f3dc7-b378-d5d8-c7a2-42bc4326fbae@nic.cz> <20180916095655.GA11121@jurassic>
In-Reply-To: <20180916095655.GA11121@jurassic>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/8zhTfPpqNxr_Atq0Vt1PZiDhuCU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 15:54:40 -0000

this proposal appears to make more sense. if cname cannot be used until 
everybody has upgraded, then some other ?name RR could be used instead, 
on a similar time line, and would have no impact on those who never 
upgraded.