Re: [DNSOP] requesting WGLC for 5011-security-considerations

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D26127201 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 15:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YeIWIOaqsQAk for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 15:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com (mail-wr0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F54F126B72 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 15:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k67so3890577wrc.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Eavl18xpbWXP5CTrJXj98jjct9M/yygg4bPvi3CfMbY=; b=lxAxFICMGuZ6bygTCJz4e47YU8uXw+IM3Z0dvnZiV03E4IypjNjGLnMsmb7HgSJDQI jzGpXtWmEmplSPYEFqTRQpSpVz0h6qNe0Dv1D1tqoizKFVQn0G77jGTRPVc3O/nqR7HG QsjoanRBiQ68FYIs72rO4S8vv7uFRAWVu962qi+7xx7i73xc4VmqBksV7j2IFSzx06aU 6jrr9FuB+kJTfI4PfK6zCPY6+HM/zHcce+jxPHOyKzdqgac2JKUBqTpQUpMX3T++TPCx lGyk1oDTRrPcJFbs6ThhV9hIQNcavZ026XHKfooUiU2LursM6XsVJFO88iRlDlV+WhgT qTNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Eavl18xpbWXP5CTrJXj98jjct9M/yygg4bPvi3CfMbY=; b=UjuNqdmzpSaj4OXu4C/CFEGqEYAgMeefYBVV8hOuqzQ0cMKmgrF/92r0rp/7hhd8AG VCaExDA7lh1FzgJ7/ku0r9UGyhkQlmxSHZoxSPSX9NAEOpCcdEm6YyoXGw7shtRS0kic FjeueeKWsioTWlUEMHKfFcPVFw7pE/b/2g0TKHcAHrPfgfS0crjLIXljU0LnUCFmHiNQ KLviDf82GlC8RhYuaB5YMrP3Xd2oYBvgXLygNAyPkwHoU1lIxERZfDMdwPUJCIH2Oqpu 9E+8/FM6hYgG6LHcy3ukg/CcBqpgT401Sqs3m3JukhxGdOGEsw4ja6gAEX3Werfmv+H+ le6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwDJz0FkTjeRFD4RpTsCKb3qWKJ5FRB6sujiVAlq1jVru3Yh0uu 9Jh4K5lzZrL7J1uPjP/gIeGK+/g+t536
X-Received: by 10.28.223.86 with SMTP id w83mr31621279wmg.9.1499293999893; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 15:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ybl4luqq05v.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CANeU+ZBzP+0REnZf0=_t60oXD_oA1nbYMRGcoFQ221buJb8YBw@mail.gmail.com> <ybly3s2le1m.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <ybly3s2le1m.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 22:33:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CANeU+ZD7NF07hZdsQT74bZar41dW6i2k6zaNvVnbRg0WYP4tMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b08064726bc0553999619"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/93mIM-JiH9f5-yE2crKPs3Bfw8Y>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] requesting WGLC for 5011-security-considerations
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 22:33:23 -0000

That's not actually a plus you understand.   Mike

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 18:22 Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>; wrote:

> Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>; writes:
>
> > Could you hold off on this for another week? The revised version
> > dropped last week and I've been on travel and enjoying the holiday and
> > haven't had a chance to review the changes.   Thanks - Mike
>
> FYI, the changes are very small:
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-01&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-02
>
>
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> USC/ISI
>