IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Fri, 22 January 2010 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236523A6965 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:09:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v8awrv-txQm6 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EF33A68F1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "drugs.dv.isc.org", Issuer "ISC CA" (not verified)) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47221E60D3; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0MC9BTi050626; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:09:11 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <201001221209.o0MC9BTi050626@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <200904282021.n3SKL3sg051528@givry.fdupont.fr> <59A58419-FDBD-4810-B2FA-0D293FFA00A5@NLnetLabs.nl> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1001211245180.12114@newtla.xelerance.com> <1AEAE091-2EB3-41DC-A51B-8DD49C10FAD5@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:04:07 BST." <1AEAE091-2EB3-41DC-A51B-8DD49C10FAD5@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:09:11 +1100
Sender: marka@isc.org
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:09:24 -0000

Additionally NSEC3 provides no real benefit is highly structured zones
like IP6.ARPA.  It is relatively easy to enumerate a IP6.ARPA zone even
if it is using NSEC3 by making use of the zone's structure.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email