IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [dns-operations] hong kong workshop, day 2, live link

Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Tue, 09 December 2014 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rubensk@nic.br>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDC11A879F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:09:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.038
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.038 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HOST_EQ_BR=1.295, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mudVbftLUkss for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:09:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.br (mail.nic.br [IPv6:2001:12ff:0:4::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE64A1A87BA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 08:09:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D014208022A; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:09:33 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from mail.nic.br ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.nic.br [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mREAZUDoseIP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:09:32 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from rubens.in.registro.br (3.195.net.registro.br [200.160.3.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nic.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F07E5208019F; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:09:32 -0200 (BRST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br>
In-Reply-To: <54871D48.20203@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:09:32 -0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AF5477A5-1639-428A-9853-0B34C82EB9C8@nic.br>
References: <54864D77.3070606@redbarn.org> <F2CBFE92-6DFD-4B91-A025-92BDCC9569C4@nic.br> <54871D48.20203@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
To: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9J4VsQTWEgovGg9GM6PKmqzWSEw
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dns-operations] hong kong workshop, day 2, live link
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:09:49 -0000

> Em 09/12/2014, à(s) 14:03:000, Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net> escreveu:
> 
> On 12/9/14 7:29 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>> Paul,
>> 
>> Complementing what Edmon Chung mentioned that root-servers was already reserved in the last new gTLD round, here follows the complete list of reserved names:
>> 
>> AFRINIC
>> ...
>> IANA
>> NIC
>> 
> 
> 
> Is "NIC" reserved because that's what Jake Feinler's shop at SRI (on the floor below my shop) was called, or is "NIC" reserved because it is the alpha-3 code point assigned to Nicaragua by the ISO-3166-MA?


alpha-3 codes are not reserved. 

Rubens

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email