Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 28 April 2020 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBB53A0810 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZUKDAqqmLqrE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF5343A0793 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BZHH0qRgzFNC; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:17:47 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1588108667; bh=n0vbDWOjzlCI922i1tG4j/RFh5RiXdm8uOy5FpxpY1U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=LI1tf/kabGinN4OyN3o+foVoMTM22yoPP8UUm9tE+zsfjgrRFU7uYWuTKU0wJyXWC OC1hNvUbOlCngVOz8I4n37uXlDe8wRmzFkbgnjshn39G3sMQMj12/C+wFWQmKc2Vc2 ujP+KNGqINv21SuO5eWMhnonvJLBEPAGHCYUIizM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30jRB1u8kG8c; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:17:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:17:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71E9F60009B6; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:17:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E28166A9A; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:17:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:17:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <yblsggn73yr.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2004281715430.22434@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+GKAFrzeuBOFrbwYE49dBoO1gK0vZcYDauHGTH-VdWwGg@mail.gmail.com> <yblsggn73yr.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9KQ1pbVIqLmc7OvWBtXj_5K2kUU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:17:59 -0000

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, Wes Hardaker wrote:

>> We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption.
>
> I support it, though I'd feel more comfortable hearing from operators
> that want to deploy it.  I suspect there are many, but that's just suspicion.

I think you really mean IPAM vendors? Like is this something Infoblox,
bind, Bluecat and BT and Microsoft would want to incorporate into their
enterprise products?

Paul