Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-00

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Sun, 08 December 2013 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859301AE138 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:18:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vpetx-EVxx-j for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:18:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.virtualized.org (alpha.virtualized.org [199.233.229.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C94A1AE12D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:18:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpha.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCEA848F1; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 17:18:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alpha.virtualized.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alpha.virtualized.org [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56959-03; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 17:18:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (unknown [206.205.89.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drc@virtualized.org) by alpha.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AEDA8445C; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 17:18:29 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FB69092D-8B61-43E1-8BCB-A3C09DF70DD6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131208215922.7CEEBB5B1BC@rock.dv.isc.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 14:18:21 -0800
Message-Id: <B8C5E801-9540-4324-A994-285F8E83A34F@virtualized.org>
References: <52A329C4.8050501@teamaol.com> <E7568EE8-99D1-422B-9B24-40D6D0CFE118@virtualized.org> <20131208215922.7CEEBB5B1BC@rock.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 22:18:36 -0000

Mark,

On Dec 8, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>> seems to be a subset of
> David you need to learn the definition of subset. They are overlapping sets.

Sigh.
 
>> Options to deal with this:
>> 1. revise the IANA considerations section to indicate that both
>> registries need to be updated
>> 2. remove the locally served zones from the special-use-domain-names
>> registry
>> 3. merge the two registries into a single uber-wonky-name registry
>> 4. give up on this DNS thing as it was clearly a mistake and go back to
>> ip address literals

And what's your choice?

Or do you not see it as an issue?

Regards,
-drc