IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 14 February 2014 08:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F341A0114 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:19:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tYnPjJyZ9erp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915BE1A0121 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A83542802C7; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:19:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B13280129; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:19:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DEBB38038; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:19:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:19:14 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Message-ID: <20140214081914.GA3151@nic.fr>
References: <20140210205838.15973.63281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E63B37B9-EFA0-43A5-9AC5-81CEC23C342C@viagenie.ca> <00BDA580-984F-41D1-8659-04278737A526@hopcount.ca> <20140213145932.GE25409@mx1.yitter.info> <BA548E83-4D14-4A08-A958-190F541D2337@viagenie.ca> <20140213155838.GH25409@mx1.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140213155838.GH25409@mx1.yitter.info>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.3
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9ZD2M5YuQDObKBKV_9gpoQdtGGo
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:19:49 -0000

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:58:38AM -0500,
 Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote 
 a message of 18 lines which said:

> > - why not just register a URN namespace and use it as they see fit?
> 
> Why didn't they do that in the first place?

Some did. For instance, the magnet people. (Although they apparently
did not register the URI scheme they are using...)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email