Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 08 May 2015 19:42 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D3C1B2EB6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2015 12:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.663
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id de0LANvz-c_M for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2015 12:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D5B01A882E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2015 12:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 3251 invoked from network); 8 May 2015 19:42:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 8 May 2015 19:42:48 -0000
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 19:42:23 -0000
Message-ID: <20150508194223.55320.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3C0ED4EA-F613-47EE-B85B-55B3B05BD7F8@virtualized.org>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9cbyP4HDZxz-Wqdz4KrhJ8cVnig>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 19:42:47 -0000

>The justification for removing home/corp/mail primarily appears to be "because they showed up
>'a lot' at the root servers". Without characterizing this a bit better, it seems to me it would
>be trivial to set up situations to move pretty much any undelegated name to the "Special Names"
>registry -- just fire up a few thousand zombies to query names in the TLD you want removed
>using random source addresses.

Hmmn.  Is this a serious accusation, or is this just channelling the
usual domainers whinging about their business plans?  

Does anyone seriously argue that those domains aren't widely used in
private networks, and that nominally private DNS names leak all the
time?

R's,
John