IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-01: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 31 October 2019 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1890120288 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOkGK2trQo3q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20324120832 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id t26so8444773qtr.5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k3ibcrDTgI+B/WBz6CPl98lUMokdz0tN7OQIJpHd8z8=; b=lpP9vvdG6+AYmzz0Gnzp5rev3ivX46orl20xu+yakuABkLlDgEt/PQ/yyRAZfCUhk2 pZcilAogp8NzzBEq7mb8RAqtJKhJG2zOUq11R6IZfLfsiq6kDnNsKVv3Q095yzW4XoIx lHbRk4FYLtJVf+4g9Q/TI+bokOhbOSgO9mVKq8GYqUW2eE8dn3mCVEGgl6hJW50hNohW ymEeHjeW6WV1kuO7pwbhc287wafXiN1ch+r5U93intG5s6wUprCWSCzQrOKUMZS9Q4q5 MuroqydulOzAqABavu4wxVhlnGRdjunUCeV6MWQTf01uaaSEiE/cjyNBIsQa+p/aNLyR +Fiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k3ibcrDTgI+B/WBz6CPl98lUMokdz0tN7OQIJpHd8z8=; b=WIGwXfefUC6NaA8d4hGEwWlttkNokYu6INI95VhDHUsguYOfnDoqu89YMd+C5dApEu iY28T1K5cf/10JFQiWHg96rpm9NXaI0SS4PprTqaakIns1LzNizy5JH3uuFkbB5cWz3O ybdqu/AxqyF6j7e4okCzOwapqJwU+IJQNagjC9OE/LGsZWtlOf7zG5knkW2wFO2sNSit nDsmym8NjaYFpELDJEf+GlDT/djkb3+geqPPd8vSh3G9yACkAzUXXKyiOmK/DTU4ypzg 45fl+N327mhwfLioBEQz8sHyk3Ip137fSIUVgNf49u/DsamOwtBDpaXTDfdET6GWxlmV i3DQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVxJ3bDtr6H1O1tFfW1MCX5Ax02Gxvtwk7yQJp3sOeGbmSvZjOR GvqI7NnD52pC/XpV/wT9T2IEdfOocZ6EYiWN4flh6w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwTlFhvrNRXzDSrPXBx50aMJj1XhTo8kzONw/l8DQShjdfRn/pa7kp/rXJByEzHfdb45aBvGNjJ1nDvak2b0wk=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:183:: with SMTP id x3mr5440317qtf.279.1572527261532; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 06:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157245121077.32596.9626261804957434200.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHw9_iK0DZVkj7sNMYm9cz_Ro7hs1oUQph4e2nL9N0nH476hAQ@mail.gmail.com> <d90f40ae-25af-daaf-624c-3ebd60d9afca@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <d90f40ae-25af-daaf-624c-3ebd60d9afca@isc.org>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:07:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iK=b6wwbxCdjfpdRDR_STA_t9nBA4Y+QBEPBLk2Fo657g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@isc.org>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, DNSOP-Chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d2dc7c059634880f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/9uwwnhve-e_WrNIgYacF4gQZNPQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-01: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:07:46 -0000

Thank you, and thanks to Alissa, both for the DISCUSS contents, and
clearing it so quickly.

W

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 5:30 AM Matthijs Mekking <matthijs@isc.org> wrote:

> Done.
>
> Matthijs
>
> On 10/30/19 5:52 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> > Hi there authors,
> > Do you think that you can get a new version posted by tomorrow morning
> > addressing these points?
> > W
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:00 PM Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
> > <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> >> draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-01: Discuss
> >>
> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> >> introductory paragraph, however.)
> >>
> >>
> >> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >>
> >>
> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> DISCUSS:
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> This document needs to incorporate the boilerplate about normative
> keywords
> >> from RFC 8174 as well as references to RFC 8174 and RFC 2119.
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> COMMENT:
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> A couple of suggestions since this is being written for posterity as a
> >> consensus document of the IETF:
> >>
> >> s/not every validator actually implements DLV/not every validator
> actually
> >> implemented DLV/
> >>
> >> s/The authors are not aware of any such use of DLV./There are no known
> uses of
> >> DLV for this./
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email