IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] SIG(0) useful (and used?)

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Thu, 21 June 2018 08:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5B2130DC1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NrsRx0S-Wko6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4227130ED0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id m4-v6so2093218lfj.13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=L/xfpE7VANEVMCoJrcXILz7Aj6uvJUJZGHTGwpOBaCo=; b=B/7Sb/0ww19GPFXmQyJSUDMnTCjfg6Vng0N6ljcSxwMyORFteVrXI6QS5I/WTLcFa+ tmt5gv6J0pxg9HOSJn9OjeaUk0zlfVZHAOj+H69OF/mysHcEepuoI5oza34aVvADmSfC Py6VVU8qDp5aH7pNoQ+78foT/6iwlOIK/y+bM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=L/xfpE7VANEVMCoJrcXILz7Aj6uvJUJZGHTGwpOBaCo=; b=rW1OXKfwuOeTIUHMeTVpTcKal4pabuUbho+iPeYrGV4RrRJlHCWCp58hHHtgZGal3d BbNsBHCPQYhXIGvsw5RPL4vbDjFACfqBgjgdEFHBItIt+IDeolvz3UnFC/bSp8109Xf7 TcTX6QvbHkHZwY23MTwoBb12a1X8dYWy6c+sNHhXfZGJcReFpTLLqyRQHwN1zEIi00TB VFXRfFSpyLfKiPMGMknrxVDnl0FJhD82rSo1MqG/9aIF2RjsZDtpd/U/1MvdJJ9KYQ/g iTmfbE6bOkbsU38l+QODLr/mp2msTh5HZt3OQRKXX/5kHv53S/h2kEsQKLPWlTZ6DRbA 5sCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0/IRZd6uyUbbFuVUCgAzyq4XDwRAN2Dgsh/bIqaEfDcM8LTtQv B+tCuwTvQMPgvlUJituZzPdVTUg5GbVq97yhjtaqIg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJIrehBn21JgqrdjgqgRlOypkd7+xcnuhObU98EMMhPsN4oOvyHr4BOV9U+u6FUNXw4SFDXiTiLJ6yYgOzpFT0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7a0f:: with SMTP id v15-v6mr17199795ljc.68.1529571135742; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 04:52:14 -0400
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
References: <6C8533C2-6510-4A0E-A7EA-50EB83E43A7D@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1806192154190.916@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAHw9_i+KWdEQEyXE3AVKChrnYWOvhdm5uAZHpaz+tATyh0EmJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJhMdTNqSq9fVpf6MrkJqsghKB40MP3BUBfq7xcGZ6_9W72Ggg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdVtGKjTpAu3ySi_C=Am+7pE-OX_e3M+T1+WGH0AL20oMQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdVtGKjTpAu3ySi_C=Am+7pE-OX_e3M+T1+WGH0AL20oMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 04:52:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJhMdTOX5GfhkhFyRyWN6F-3B4D+pU7NOOewhM9SHdSSjy6uMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, ondrej@isc.org, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000347a58056f230805"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/A4T1lMRCjrWfZVVjMHL1i7uteqQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] SIG(0) useful (and used?)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 08:52:25 -0000

On Jun 20, 2018, at 21:05, Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com> wrote:


On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:30 PM Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:

> On Jun 20, 2018, at 19:07, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
> ​... what I'd alway wanted[0] was to be able to setup my own recursive
> name server somewhere on the Internet, and then only allow myself (and a
> few of my closest friends) to be able to query it.
>
> For this particular use-case, why is SIG(0) better than TSIG?
>

Either might be fine in these small user scenarios.


Yes, I know, hence the question. Warren usually has his reasons :-)

The follow-on question was why he needs this functionality in the stub
resolver rather than running a local copy of BIND9 (bound to localhost,
configured appropriately) and pointing his stub resolver at that.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email