Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 14 April 2020 00:04 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA523A2164 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 17:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FMBLp1iU7EvF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 17:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D0D3A2163 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 17:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22CE63AB00B; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 00:04:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 172C516005D; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 00:04:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B7A160083; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 00:04:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 0vV5hK3Z1Zz7; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 00:04:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.30.42.69] (unknown [49.2.228.79]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6BD2D16005D; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 00:04:20 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200411175736.A4EBC1774BAF@ary.qy>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:04:17 +1000
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CB12A179-1ED4-49D3-A7C0-785FED697805@isc.org>
References: <20200411175736.A4EBC1774BAF@ary.qy>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/AAO6x6aDtuFVSUhMwHXw_-WgIZE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 00:04:24 -0000
> On 12 Apr 2020, at 03:57, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > > In article <CAHPuVdX5ihg5_hiwyatuXXxvUG6Luh1nQeFGtfvsm-f--bxYGQ@mail.gmail.com> you write: >> Sure. Brian was asking specifically asking about the TLD case, so my >> answer was in that context. For that space, I think one of the issues is: >> even if they were willing to verify all the delegations, it isn't clear what >> they are permitted to do about it, beyond notification to the registrants >> (or so I've heard). > > Remember that in ICANN contracted TLDs and in some ccTLDs, a registry > can only contact registrants by going through the registrars. So they sent the notices via the registrar. There is nothing preventing that. Just a unwillingness to exercise the path. Registrars that fail to pass on notices would, I presume, be in breach of contract. > While I > can imagine some hack (EPP probably) for the registry to tell the > registrar about inconsistent NS, I don't see the point. The lousy > registrars won't care, the good ones could check and notify themselves > if they want to. The parent zone operators are already required to perform the checks (see STD 13). Just because many have been too lazy to do so doesn’t excuse them of the responsibility they took on when choosing to manage the zone. Now if they want to amend the contract they have with the registrars so that they do they checks they are free to do so but they still have to ensure the checks are done. "As the last installation step, the delegation NS RRs and glue RRs necessary to make the delegation effective should be added to the parent zone. The administrators of both zones should insure that the NS and glue RRs which mark both sides of the cut are consistent and remain so.” I don’t see “unless you are a TLD operator” in there as a exemption. The “and remain so” implies the regular checks need to be made. The instructions clearly require “both sides” to check and take steps remedy inconsistencies. The requirement to communicate through a registrar is not a “get out of gaol free” card. > I suppose you could make a general observation that DNS operators can > check for inconsistent NS and when practical warn the child operator > but that sounds like "don't forget to brush your teeth" sort of advice. > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Mark Andrews
- [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Puneet Sood
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Ólafur Guðmundsson
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Gavin McCullagh
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Giovane C. M. Moura
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Gavin McCullagh
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Masataka Ohta
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Shumon Huque
- [DNSOP] Client Validation - filtering validation? Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Giovane C. M. Moura
- Re: [DNSOP] Client Validation - filtering validat… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [DNSOP] Client Validation - filtering validat… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Client Validation - filtering validat… S Moonesamy
- Re: [DNSOP] Client Validation - filtering validat… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Client Validation - filtering validat… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Daniel Migault
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Privacy and DNSSEC Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Giovane C. M. Moura
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Daniel Migault
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Giovane C. M. Moura
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Giovane C. M. Moura
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Gavin McCullagh
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft on delegation revalidation Paul Vixie