Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303-01

Hi

I have read through this and would support its progress.  A reminder for 
the record would not be a bad idea I think.

On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:

>
> 	Can we please move on this.
>
> 	The reverse address are not yet insecurely delegated as
> 	would be required for RFC 6598 compliance.  This is starting
> 	to cause operational problems for ISP's that validate DNS
> 	responses as they can't deploy local IN-ADDR.ARPA zones
> 	until that insecure delegation is done.
>
> 	Also should I add a reminder to the IANA Considerations that
> 	the insecure delegation needs to be performed?
>
> 	e.g.
>
> 	"IANA is reminded that a insecure delegation for these zones
> 	is required for compliance with RFC 6598 to break the DNSSEC
> 	chain of trust."
>
> 	Mark
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE:	+61 2 9871 4742		         INTERNET: marka@isc.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

wfms