IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 14 July 2015 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA9B1A6F0A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z0_l5o0-9RN9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C8801A3BA2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:60571) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1ZF329-0005WR-T0 (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:26:18 +0100
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1ZF329-0007ZE-Um (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:26:17 +0100
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:26:17 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <83A64168-3510-4E0B-AA23-54547C05990B@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1507141719130.32296@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CAEKtLiQWPM6yJZZASQ5k1bzsbHc3jv5FRsJ6ifgUdj9TRLCmRg@mail.gmail.com> <83A64168-3510-4E0B-AA23-54547C05990B@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/AK2e5TNrjfLgDy45X9oqPxxP5yU>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:26:25 -0000

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
>
> This is still contentious, and I think it really should be deferred to the
> -bis document for longer discussion and hopefully consensus.

As far as I can tell from the last few months there is a fairly clear
consensus that the current draft is not good enough. Brushing off
suggestions by saying that we'll publish a turkey then fix it up later is
not a good way to encourage people to contribute.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Southeast Fitzroy: Northerly 5 to 7. Moderate, occasionally rough in south.
Fair. Good.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status