IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis: hopefully ready for WG Last Call

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 19 October 2020 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stephane@sources.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5273A0C8E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eeniGbRdesKs for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ayla.bortzmeyer.org (ayla.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fe27:3d3f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0417C3A0C8A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ayla.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id D3DD5A02A3; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:53:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F375C190029; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:48:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:48:10 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20201019164810.GA28178@sources.org>
References: <C0C343BA-D0A6-46A0-90C8-053793BC5F40@icann.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2010141752020.8465@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2010141752020.8465@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.6
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/AOQkljM0vpEkmV2nLDKDfLWPhgI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis: hopefully ready for WG Last Call
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:53:12 -0000

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 07:15:10PM +0100,
 Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote 
 a message of 53 lines which said:

> Section 3, algorithm step 5: what is a "hidden QTYPE"?

The original QTYPE, which may be "hidden" by a substitution to another
QTYPE (see section 2 "a QTYPE selected by the resolver to hide the
original QTYPE"). This was not in RFC 7816. Would you prefer we settle
on "original QTYPE"?

> Step 6, what is the "minimised QTYPE"?

The opposite of "hidden QTYPE", it is the QTYPE choosen by the
resolver (NS was recommended in RFC 7816, but it is A in 7816-bis).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email