[DNSOP] 5011-security-considerations status
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 01 February 2018 18:31 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2673F12EB38 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:31:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zezT4BNZzk0m for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (unknown [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043C6126DCA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A347249BE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:30:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:30:44 -0800
Message-ID: <yblh8r05zqj.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ARtB_VkJ6si6kOTOWzDq-iaxeT8>
Subject: [DNSOP] 5011-security-considerations status
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:31:16 -0000
Sorry for the long delay to get this version out (vacation, family issues, deadlines are all just excuses). The -11 version of the document has a redesigned 6.1.6 that I'd love everyone to concentrate on. Hopefully it more clearly articulates the issues surrounding Mike's found need to wait yet another activeRefresh and spells out the analysis behind the delay better (three potential delays, from which we take the maximum value). We had spoken at the last meeting of doing another update and a 1 week last call again. Due to the complexity of the changes in -11, I'd like to request a 2-week last call instead as I think the changes are important enough to warrant a longer LC. Chairs? Thoughts? -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [DNSOP] 5011-security-considerations status Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] 5011-security-considerations status Michael StJohns
- Re: [DNSOP] 5011-security-considerations status Wes Hardaker