Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-11

Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Tue, 07 August 2018 06:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E3B130E55; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 23:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXU_fHFOrGkE; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 23:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77259130DE8; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 23:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id b15-v6so26421857oib.10; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 23:04:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LnUV0h9JPr8Ar2oMRZaPn8T9KvgavjO6FOsaB9gUXB0=; b=oVARitP5am9KAB3spUgafWEolp1d9rDa7HCbWZcXUl5vb72cn54nBuzSyDtDav3vqn TwhZOMVdkSrtErFpmt0sFNrlnUJR6cTilkIYJ1rXVzZ7J9DmG4j4LLEL6TmjeG1tNQpn x2/1xJPIZhViCRHM72B53Sr1Cv/ImUxuT+5CvPCRxSKy/kr3H5xmuQoC85ETYVM0ITiG cWycajpUQt7G4EvV251pqMkYPQj06hSTfrzAIglA9odX8MenGELNXFnOnmxJFzYqF7Rl 3sm3AGWaaZh1dzSxjiIQ51pFMoJjYP9TY+D01+ctToOp87JwxOdUL4G5MwSYeetj3tJo n5cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LnUV0h9JPr8Ar2oMRZaPn8T9KvgavjO6FOsaB9gUXB0=; b=K552rIAtS3LTcbMtu4TBN/2QiAx46OdDQWuvrVcdrFmNBlXh5iFs0ZOpuUWO6Z1Ved wJM2cYBbc0N2UnxIQeU1uUdSQWw0lSe4uOU0wAeXYQCd6F7Dyyi7ZiA8zmgRwisiJ4WI YUFhV0S+A8CUWU1A+HQR6v3pesenEcYpLeK7TTxmX8p0YA+eolecisfm5vswGNpqhTFL VTdg4+0ZJ0AojzJBU+DgWNvkzhA9Y65cQd3xCXVFLlKJrE89+rp3+wpsylhtw/Fh4YOJ 4+V8wUUVOyuQKeXbGuGOpfEghgX1vO9wEiWjkz4p5KQZgUa/NmWUU/IobSyovtli8yKE KIDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlESOOW7rtXkHXJL4wW0Xl55E/OfKYSs1+Jqi7YmkOLtSv0KilHL TPL4WWm67a6IbTMMSqcjhc6uSm42uuX8PdPw5mD3Ow==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfkhwdE0w43lVwHSvev1UV3GVXaRkYIjmZAujUaU0Wqr/pTpdTZEE43WATrxnuKuv4gFllBPS9U7Htg0CfswjA=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:45c3:: with SMTP id s186-v6mr16756147oia.289.1533621872810; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 23:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:aca:f0c:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 23:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0CD18946-1208-40C4-86B8-E0DFFBD96D03@icann.org>
References: <153354574511.26803.11164308130374229230@ietfa.amsl.com> <0CD18946-1208-40C4-86B8-E0DFFBD96D03@icann.org>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:04:32 +0300
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4W+Cx0N9x=r5wvb1kZMJ+sb+A8vK4_4+pvPxUg4bqMuJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f2e2a30572d22a9e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/AYacLGOr4bXthq8lClENgdJwJqM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-11
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 06:04:35 -0000

Hi Paul,

Thank you for the timely and to-the-points answer. Thanks for addressing my
comments, I will not insist on items that you decided to leave as they are,
it's up to the OPS ADs to raise the issue if they consider any of these
important enough. As I said, I believe that the document is Ready from an
OPS-DIR perspective, and none of the comments is a show-stopper.

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> On Aug 6, 2018, at 1:55 AM, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > 8. I found the Index to be very useful, and I wish other documents of
> this size
> > and complexity (or worse) include such a section.
>
> Thanks, this is good to hear. (And I say that as the co-author who
> objected strenuously to adding the index because no one uses them...)
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
>
>
Maybe it's because communities that are less dealing with the terminology
on the day-to-day basis are the ones that need more such Index sessions?

Regards,

Dan