IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Wed, 31 January 2018 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE131319E1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 02:08:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.452
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nTAHtlS5zGtp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 02:08:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 243A0131AE4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 02:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [88.212.170.147] (port=57328 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1egpFK-0000m9-LS (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 10:04:02 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <9DCE2F63-EE37-4865-B9D6-6B79BBE05593@gmail.com> <20180129155112.GC16545@mx4.yitter.info> <5A6F5CF1.4080706@redbarn.org> <CA+nkc8D7tne5SxGOUhvJqstmDa=1=RmvcHQte1byAab5dUd5sQ@mail.gmail.com> <AE634FC4-0EAF-4F54-8860-61E41284F873@fugue.com> <20180130185919.GJ19193@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <3b57a486-df8e-ca57-ab89-c167cea0dcc9@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 10:04:03 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180130185919.GJ19193@mx4.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/A_j9eEvpXYC6rSy9rrFb29_NQvo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 10:08:45 -0000

On 30/01/2018 18:59, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> Because of that same section, also, signing the answer should also not
> be controversial because the answer is static.  My preference,
> however, would be for the root servers to REFUSE to answer such
> queries.

Won't that cause the resolver to cycle through every root server letter
hoping for one that doesn't give that answer?

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email