IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 11 May 2017 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09888129BF0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.479
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=SaX654iO; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=B114R20b
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fddVdPHZlO2p for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B56D5130A94 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 44745 invoked from network); 11 May 2017 17:41:18 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=aec7.5914a23e.k1705; bh=oW9SfJl5phDAV9SJVXjiKjUw+ygTa4iFUWOULh9ZyG8=; b=SaX654iOAqmOt9Xp7IU36YHTVv5k+GYX5v2e3A011cY1Nntm/iQFnFnFpiLZep3gmnQao9yPBB6ahg0qVPDH9JNSno8GWlndyjBay8xkOiMwyBk9GoGMQ+IWUES8Sg1IZL6oIe7LC2+vaMTvbB5ikgO1B5rzjvWTTm29/wn7JC90n5+oECcKEk6bzrei9Z1bPxBTz9r9566ELiD3NgjfdquL5Eq/G8sRqLxSE7b7RfEh+UMRM/O8NUlgTeDw9JdN
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=aec7.5914a23e.k1705; bh=oW9SfJl5phDAV9SJVXjiKjUw+ygTa4iFUWOULh9ZyG8=; b=B114R20bHUlWytlI/v7DXjkIOWQA1Ua84/+NwU3yNvxJ+ryOID5GOmhNgNzIvvaa8QlbYSHW03RXNoGBcPnBgDuJuULolgRXnAZWQoi20FJPYmJ8M9Fdar8lZIi3LbhFskAog81foOBxD+eI/JR3r3gwxsD8rBofclRI4Rza9yLMU5CzSaI0JIaQlExa0p7ScZUc3KTMhMFTKpMW1is5TWtbZGHvlbsj9B12qdDQX+bhfGwnJ79+rjMKrzURVnvY
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 11 May 2017 17:41:18 -0000
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 13:41:18 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1705111336050.38256@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5914A0B7.805@redbarn.org>
References: <20170511165852.34338.qmail@ary.lan> <59149F29.6090908@redbarn.org> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1705111329370.38256@ary.qy> <5914A0B7.805@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Aq5mymgFUn4i1DFxAjAWeJ7GKGM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 17:46:26 -0000

>> You might want to talk to large providers that do v6 now.  With only one
>> exception I can think of, they have no plans to do synthesized v6 rDNS,
>> and they routinely block port 25 from all their consumer networks.
>
> i'd like to meet your friends. but i'd also like them write an rfc about it.

You've met a lot of them at M3AAWG.  Also see draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns

I hope we are not so foolish as to repeat the NAT fiasco and stick our 
fingers in our ears becuse the rest of the world doesn't work in a way 
some of us might prefer.

The reality is that if you want people to accept your v6 mail, your mail 
hosts need rDNS, and not rDNS that looks like it was autogenerated by 
kludges like BULK.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email