Re: [DNSOP] New draft for consideration:
Martin Hoffmann <martin@opennetlabs.com> Sun, 24 March 2019 12:38 UTC
Return-Path: <martin@opennetlabs.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0D51275F3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 05:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UVRHTu4DdYVp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 05:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FEAD127981 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 05:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix, from userid 58) id 4A4C0AA7F; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:38:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smaug.local.partim.de (82-197-214-124.dsl.cambrium.nl [82.197.214.124]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEF4CAA76 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:37:40 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=opennetlabs.com
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=martin@opennetlabs.com
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:37:40 +0100
From: Martin Hoffmann <martin@opennetlabs.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190324133740.2c897eef@smaug.local.partim.de>
In-Reply-To: <E2267015-0A5F-4D6E-85F0-3FA93348CA79@icann.org>
References: <E2267015-0A5F-4D6E-85F0-3FA93348CA79@icann.org>
Organization: Open Netlabs
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/AqGQkyGH3QgssK6KOKpJHCwAoYo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New draft for consideration:
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 12:38:11 -0000
Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. As y'all have seen over the past few weeks, the > discussion of where DNS resolution should happen and over what > transports has caused some people to use conflicting terms. As a > possible solution to the terminology problems, I am proposing a few > abbreviations that people can use in these discussions. The draft > below, if adopted by the DNSOP WG, would update RFC 8499 with a small > set of abbreviations. I would like to boldly suggest to not or at least not only define abbreviations but proper names for the more general concepts instead. The ship has probably sailed for the protocols itself and they will now forever be DoH and DoT, but maybe we can agree on something more meaningful such as "traditional [name] resolution" v. "alternative [name] resolution" for the what the draft calls DaT and DaO. The reasoning here is that proper terms are less confusing and, if chosen wisely, can be understood by someone not intimately familiar with the matter. When speaking, they aren’t much more bothersome than the abbreviation. Writing will be a bit more work but then again, an extra layer of clarity can help with avoiding misunderstanding. I will spare you my aesthetic concerns around camel-case abbreviations. Kind regards, Mar*shudder*tin
- [DNSOP] New draft for consideration: Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft for consideration: Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft for consideration: bert hubert
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for consideration: Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for consideration: Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for consideration: Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft for consideration: Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for consideration: Olli Vanhoja
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for consideration: Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for consideration: Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for consideration: Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft for consideration: Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: New draft for consideration: Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft for consideration: Patrick McManus
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft for consideration: Livingood, Jason
- Re: [DNSOP] New draft for consideration: Joe Abley